Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Proposed Agenda: IGO-INGO Meeting for 12 JUNE 2013 @ 16:00 UTC

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

On 12 Jun 2013, at 10:07, Thomas Rickert wrote:

> 
> In that regard, I would like to hear from the group - in particular Avri - 
> whether the reference made to existing TLDs in 4.4. is deemed sufficient. 

I thought it was sufficient until I read Chuck's note.  I think there is 
content in Chuck's note that should be added to 4.4.  
I just want to make sure we don't lose sight of this.

> As we move on with our work on the substance of our task, we will surely 
> discuss the issue of incumbent TLDs in more depth. 

ok

> 
> Also, if there were additional points on the report, please let us know. 
> Please bear in mind that - as Chuck rightfully said - there will be the 
> opportunity for all of you to comment on the report. 

true.

But the longer it is on the table, the more often I will read it, parts of it 
at least, and the more often I will find things to comment on. 
Just the nature of the beast.

For example had I not been looking for mention of the incumbents, I would not 
have noticed that the report did not mention our strong exception to special 
exemptions.
I know that I am essentially ready to agree that at the end of today's phone 
call you go live with the initial report.


avri