RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] Some important questions

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Avri.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 6:34 AM
To: GNSO IGO INGO (gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx)
Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Some important questions


Hi,

The list changes slowly, yearly when new organizations are reviewed and some 
are admitted.  The process of applying to be listed takes about a year or a 
little more.  http://csonet.org/?menu=83  

On the question of support I hope there are organizations who support NGOs 
given the critical nature of the work they do.

This is a good question about the IGO list as well.  On that one, I have no 
idea.  Will it change every time an IGO petitions the GAC?


avri


On 29 Aug 2013, at 06:08, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> Regarding the use of the ECOSOC lists, some important questions were asked by 
> one of the RySG members:
> 1.       Was it discussed how frequently this 2 lists change?  Is it an 
> obligation for the registry operator to check for updates? 
> 2.       Was it discussed how changes would be accounted for, added  or 
> deleted, the process for this?
>  
> In my opinion, these are questions we will need to consider if there is 
> enough WG support for any of the INGO recommendations.
>  
> In the meantime, if anyone has any thoughts about these issues, I would like 
> to hear them.
>  
> Chuck
> "This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the 
> individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information 
> that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from 
> disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as attorney work 
> product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
> any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is 
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify 
> sender immediately and delete this message immediately."
>