ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-igo-ingo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-igo-ingo] consensus

  • To: "Thomas Rickert (rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx)" <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] consensus
  • From: "Claudia MACMASTER TAMARIT" <MACMASTER@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:21:14 +0000

Hi Thomas,

Thank you, again.

In light of yesterday's call, we've compared reactions on Recommendation 1 
between the IOC and other INGOs.  It appears to us that both columns reflect 
consensus, and feel that it would be appropriate to reflect this.

We raise this now for transparency and consistency as it may have weight on any 
further comments.

Recommendation 1:

Top-Level protections of Exact Match, Full Name Scope 1 identifiers ... are 
placed in the Applicant Guidebook section 2.2.1.2.3, Strings "Ineligible for 
Delegation"

IOC - consensus

INGOs - sssop

PI: I support fully the draft recommendations in the document

PI: I support fully the draft recommendations in the document

IOC: Support

ISO,IEC: Support

RL: Do Not Support

RL: Do Not Support

RySG: Yes

RySG: Yes

NCSG remains against any blocking of strings in the AGB. Objection procedures  
should be used for this purpose.

NCSG remains against any blocking of strings in the AGB. Objection procedures 
should be used for this purpose.  Further we think that IGO and INGO should 
have the same level of protections in all cases and do not support protection 
for the IGO category if the INGO category is not also protected.

IPC: Support

IPC: Divergence of Views

ISPCP: Support

ISPCP:  Can live with.  We are against protection for INGOs, but if it is neede 
to reach some level of consensus we can accept it.

ALAC: No

ALAC: Can live with


Again thank you, and ICANN staff.

Respectfully,
Claudia (ISO)
--- Begin Message ---
  • To: "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Latest Work Products for IGO-INGO Consensus Call
  • From: Berry Cobb <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:06:16 +0000
WG Members,



Please find attached the latest versions of the documents for the Consensus 
Call as we prepare to release the draft Final Report for Public Comment next 
week.  A few notes about the attached documents:

1.       IGO-INGO_Consensus_Recommendations_v1.3 – contains the compilation of 
responses from groups and individual for the first round of the consensus call. 
 As of today, this does not include the RrSG and the CBUC support statements, 
but we anticipate them to be sent shortly.  As I get each official statement, I 
will send out a revised version of this document.

2.       IGO-INGO_Final_Report_v0.1 – This version of the report contains all 
the tracked-changes as it migrated from Initial to draft Final.  There are far 
too many changes for this to be a useful tool, and thus all changes were 
accepted in v0.2, but I included it for your reference.

3.       IGO-INGO_Final_Report_v0.3 – This version includes all changes that 
were accepted in v0.2 and it includes tracked changes that were made as a 
result of today’s call.  This version has the latest consensus levels, but note 
that it does not include Minority View statements.



Please provide any feedback or suggested changes within the v0.3 version of the 
report (track changes are enabled).  Also as a reminder, for those groups that 
anticipate including a Minority View position statement, please send those 
along to the list and I will incorporate them into the master version of 
Section 5.



DUE DATE:  All suggest edits, changes, and Minority View statements must be 
submitted to the list by 17 September 2013 @ 22:00 UTC (note, I extended this 
by 6 hours to give groups a bit more time.)



As stated on the call, we will review the final version of the report in next 
week’s call, and with the WG’s permission submit the report for Public Comment 
on 19 September 2013.  We will discuss in detail this round of the public 
comment forum in addition to any discussions we have about the policy 
recommendations.



Thank you for everyone’s participation today.  Happy reading!  J



B



Berry Cobb

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)

720.839.5735

mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

@berrycobb





Attachment: IGO-INGO_Consensus_Recommendations_v1.3.doc
Description: IGO-INGO_Consensus_Recommendations_v1.3.doc

Attachment: IGO-INGO_Final_Report_v0.3.docx
Description: IGO-INGO_Final_Report_v0.3.docx

Attachment: IGO-INGO_Final_Report_v0.1.docx
Description: IGO-INGO_Final_Report_v0.1.docx


--- End Message ---


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy