RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] why are we doing this?

["Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Avri,

Please explain more?  

As I understand it, these names are on the reserved list pending the outcome
of the policy process.

You may view the likelihood of these coming off the reserved list as
unlikely regardless of the PDP process.  Is that your concern?

Also, what, if anything, was added to the list of temporary protections most
recently?

Thanks.

Jonathan

-----Original Message-----
From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: 19 September 2013 04:58
To: GNSO IGO INGO (gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx)
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] why are we doing this?


Hi,

Given the complete disregard the Board and Sr Staff have for GNSO PRP
processes as demonstrated in:

http://www.icann.org/sites/default/files/packages/reserved-names/ReservedNam
es.xml

Can somebody explain why we are bothering to figure out the minutia of our
consensus levels.

Does it really matter?

avri