ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-igo-ingo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Draft Final Report - Update

  • To: "'Berry Cobb'" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Draft Final Report - Update
  • From: "Shatan, Gregory S." <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 18:11:38 +0000

That sounds more like it!

From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Berry Cobb
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 3:08 AM
To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] RE: Draft Final Report - Update

Team,

Please forgive my late night submission.

I should have stated “Consensus For” or “Consensus 
Against”……….NOT……….“Divergence For” or “Divergence Against”.

Thank you.  B

Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
@berrycobb


From: Berry Cobb [mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 23:53
To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Draft Final Report - Update

WG Members,

Per our discussion today about recommendations assigned divergent levels of 
consensus and how they may mask overwhelming opposition, I wanted to first 
advise that I was able to confer with other ICANN staff to determine a path 
forward.  In short, it was considered a higher risk to modify the substance of 
the recommendations during the consensus call, but it was determined that a 
method of assigning “Divergence Against” or “Divergence For” can be utilized.  
The requirement for the WG is that this assignment must be consistent across 
all recommendations where divergence is assigned.  However, not all divergent 
recommendations clearly designate overwhelming opposition like the General 
Recommendation #4 we discussed today.

I feel it is important that I share and explain these potential modifications 
to the consensus levels with Thomas before delivering the report to the WG.  
Therefore, this email does not include the next version of the draft Final 
Report as promised in today’s conference call.  I did however make great 
progress with the updates to the draft Final Report.

As soon as I confer with Thomas (appx Thurs. 14 UTC), I will make any final 
changes as necessary and send the next version of the report to the list.  I 
will include a redline version (that will not contain the sections realigned 
agreed to avoid massive redline) and a clean version of the report (w/ all 
track changes accepted) for easier review.

Given the amount of changes, we will postpone the Public Comment Forum 
announcement until Friday.  Per our work plan, we can afford an additional day 
without missing the deadline for the BA GNSO Council meeting.

Please stay tuned.

Thank you.  B

Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
@berrycobb





* * *

This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential and may 
well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on notice 
of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete 
this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any 
purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you for your 
cooperation.

* * *

To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform you that, 
unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax advice contained in 
this communication  (including any attachments) is not intended or written to 
be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under 
the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state and local provisions or (2) 
promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters 
addressed herein.

Disclaimer Version RS.US.20.10.00


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy