ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-igo-ingo] MP3 IGO - INGO meeting - Thursday 07 november 2013

  • To: "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] MP3 IGO - INGO meeting - Thursday 07 november 2013
  • From: Julia Charvolen <julia.charvolen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 01:06:32 -0800

Dear All,

Please find the MP3 recording of the IGO-INGO Protections Policy Development 
Process (PDP) Working Group teleconference held on Thursday  07 November 2013 
at 1600 UTC at:


 Please also note one other IGO/INGO PDP working group meeting tentatively 
scheduled for Friday 8 November 2013 at 14:00 UTC.

 On page: 

The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master 
Calendar page:

Jim Bikoff – IPC/IOC
Stephane Hankins – Red Cross Red Crescent
David Heasley – IPC/IOC
Claudia MacMaster Tamarit – ISO
Osvaldo Novoa – ISPCP
Christopher Rassi – Red Cross Red Crescent
Thomas Rickert – NCA –Working group chair
Griffin Barnette – IPC/IOC

Chuck Gomes - RySG
Wolfgang Kleinwaechter - NCSG

ICANN Staff:
Marika Konings
Berry Cobb
Mary Wong
Julia Charvolen

** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **

Thank you.
Kind regards,
Julia Charvolen
For GNSO Secretariat

Adobe Chat Transcript 07 November 2013:
  Berry Cobb:Welcome to the 7 Nov 2013 IGO-INGO WG "Special Edition" Conference 
  Claudia MacMaster Tamarit (ISO):Fully echoed.
  Mary Wong:@Claudia, we hope you and your colleagues will continue to 
  Berry Cobb:@Claudia, which WG can we sign you up for next?
  Berry Cobb::-)
  Claudia MacMaster Tamarit (ISO)::)  Absolutely.
  Julia Charvolen:Stephane Hankins joined the call
  Claudia MacMaster Tamarit (ISO):We are also submitting a revised Minority 
Statement (though the changes are not substantive, but rather to update 
  Griffin Barnett:Would it make more sense to move the two "Consensus Against" 
"recommendations" from the table in Section 3.5 (General Recommendations) and 
move them to the General Proposals section of Section 3.6 (Unsupported 
  Mary Wong:@Griffin, I believe the sense of the WG from last week's call is 
that there IS support, for the contrary proposal - which is why the two are 
where they are (Sec 3.5).
  Griffin Barnett:understood, thans.
  Griffin Barnett:*thanks
  Mary Wong:Thanks, Stephane - I will add that to the Whereas clauses.
  Mary Wong:Thanks all!

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy