ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off

  • To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off
  • From: Mike Zupke <Mike.Zupke@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 06:50:25 -0700

Thanks, James. 

The schedule/project plan is indeed topic #1.  But I think the bigger
question - how does this fit into all of the rest of the work underway? - is
probably outside this group's remit.  My team (on staff) is currently
mapping out all of the implementation items we see on the horizon and trying
to figure out a way to manage those in a responsible way.  I think,
ultimately, it might require a discussion with the GNSO council, but that's
as far as my thinking has progressed to date...  Happy to discuss on the
call if you and others like.



Mike Zupke

Director, Registrar Programs

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers


From: James M. Bladel [mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 6:01 PM
To: Mike Zupke; gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off


Mike and Team:


What is ICANN's plan w.r.t. scheduling this implementation?  We are still
working on Rec 9 of IRTP-B, ERRP, TMCH, and soon New gTLDs and the 2013 RAA.
I'm concerned that these changes are starting to work against each other,
and are definitely contending for the same development resources.  


Recommend we make this Agenda Topic #1 during our first call.






From: Mike Zupke <Mike.Zupke@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 16:39
To: "gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off



Welcome to the Transfer Policy Working Group C Implementation Review Team
("IRTPWGCIRT").  I will be leading ICANN's implementation of the GNSO's IRTP
C recommendations, and it is my pleasure to have the opportunity to work
with you on this effort.


As a refresher, the GNSO made 3 recommendations that were adopted by the
ICANN Board:

1. Modify the IRTP / Create a consensus policy that would apply to
inter-registrant transfers.

2. Revise the existing Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy related to the
expiration of the Form of Authorization used by registrars during transfers.

3. Require registries to include registrars' GURIDs (aka IANA IDs) in Whois


Recommendation 3 is currently being implemented by Staff, so that leaves
recs 1 & 2 for us.  There is quite a bit of work to be done on these, so
I've created a project plan that I'd like to share with you for feedback on
a kick-off call.  If you're interested in attending, would you kindly enter
your availability in this doodle poll?: http://doodle.com/7uq5vaiyu7n8fpu8 


Thanks in advance.  I look forward to working with you.  




Mike Zupke

Director, Registrar Programs

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy