ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off

  • To: Mike Zupke <Mike.Zupke@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off
  • From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 13:56:35 +0000

Right.  And this IRT must be aware of all these new changes, particularly those 
that could affect its own items.

For example, the new 2013 RAA will have validation/verification requirements.  
The IRT must consider how this (not yet adopted) verification process will 
affect the Change of Registrant procedure.  There are probably a bunch of 
unknown dependencies like that....


From: Mike Zupke <Mike.Zupke@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Mike.Zupke@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thursday, June 6, 2013 08:50
To: James Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, 
Subject: RE: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off

Thanks, James.
The schedule/project plan is indeed topic #1.  But I think the bigger question 
- how does this fit into all of the rest of the work underway? - is probably 
outside this group's remit.  My team (on staff) is currently mapping out all of 
the implementation items we see on the horizon and trying to figure out a way 
to manage those in a responsible way.  I think, ultimately, it might require a 
discussion with the GNSO council, but that's as far as my thinking has 
progressed to date...  Happy to discuss on the call if you and others like.

Mike Zupke
Director, Registrar Programs
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

From: James M. Bladel [mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 6:01 PM
To: Mike Zupke; 
Subject: Re: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off

Mike and Team:

What is ICANN's plan w.r.t. scheduling this implementation?  We are still 
working on Rec 9 of IRTP-B, ERRP, TMCH, and soon New gTLDs and the 2013 RAA. 
I'm concerned that these changes are starting to work against each other, and 
are definitely contending for the same development resources.

Recommend we make this Agenda Topic #1 during our first call.



From: Mike Zupke <Mike.Zupke@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Mike.Zupke@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 16:39
To: "gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-impl-irtpc-rt@xxxxxxxxx>" 
Subject: [gnso-impl-irtpc-rt] IRTP WG C IRT Kick-off

Welcome to the Transfer Policy Working Group C Implementation Review Team 
("IRTPWGCIRT").  I will be leading ICANN's implementation of the GNSO's IRTP C 
recommendations, and it is my pleasure to have the opportunity to work with you 
on this effort.

As a refresher, the GNSO made 3 recommendations that were adopted by the ICANN 
1. Modify the IRTP / Create a consensus policy that would apply to 
inter-registrant transfers.
2. Revise the existing Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy related to the 
expiration of the Form of Authorization used by registrars during transfers.
3. Require registries to include registrars' GURIDs (aka IANA IDs) in Whois 

Recommendation 3 is currently being implemented by Staff, so that leaves recs 1 
& 2 for us.  There is quite a bit of work to be done on these, so I've created 
a project plan that I'd like to share with you for feedback on a kick-off call. 
 If you're interested in attending, would you kindly enter your availability in 
this doodle poll?: http://doodle.com/7uq5vaiyu7n8fpu8

Thanks in advance.  I look forward to working with you.


Mike Zupke
Director, Registrar Programs
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy