ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] WG: Standing Committee Drafting Team (SC-DT)

  • To: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] WG: Standing Committee Drafting Team (SC-DT)
  • From: "Rudi Vansnick" <rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:41:15 +0100 (CET)

Dear Wolf-Ulrich,

I'm very sorry but at such short notice it is difficult to change my
agenda. As I have already a meeting scheduled at 13:30 till 14:45 it will
be difficult to participate.

I suppose I'm representing ALAC as I do not see any name from ALAC in the
actual list and I'm happy to take this task on me.

For your information i will be in San Francisco and will make time
available to meet overthere.

Kind regards,

Rudi Vansnick
President/CEO Internet Society Belgium
Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16


KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Thanks Rudi,
>
> The call will be today at 13:00 UTC (14:00 CET).
> Are you representing ALAC in this regard? The reason why I'm raising this
> question is that the new Steering Committee (and the drafting team as
> well) is targeted to deal with GNSO related improvements.
> Anyway we need broad participation and I'd be happy you could make it.
>
>
>
> Best regards
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
> -----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Rudi Vansnick [mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx]
> Gesendet: Montag, 21. Februar 2011 11:00
> An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
> Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] WG: Standing Committee Drafting Team
> (SC-DT)
>
> Dear Wolf-Ulrich,
>
> I'm very sorry I couldn't make it as I was on a flight to Albania at that
> time.
>
> If I'm not wrong the date of the next call will not be 12 February as
> mentioned below, what is the date of the next call ? Is it during the
> ICANN San Francisco meeting ?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Rudi Vansnick
> President/CEO Internet Society Belgium
> Member ALAC / EURALO
> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
>
>
> KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> Maybe you've received this mail on the other mailing list.
>>
>> I was advised that this list (gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
>> <BLOCKED::mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> ) is the one which
>> should be used for this group. That's why I'm resending the E-Mail
>> attached.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>>      Von: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
>>      Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Februar 2011 16:30
>>      An: ntfy-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
>>      Betreff: Standing Committee Drafting Team (SC-DT)
>>
>>
>>      All:
>>
>>
>>
>>      Please find attached a short summary from the call on Tuesday.
>> As promised a first raw charter draft shall follow before the next call.
>>
>>
>>
>>      ---------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>      Participants on the Call, Tuesday, 15 Feb, 13:00 - 14:00 UTC:
>>
>>      Wolf-Ulrich Knoben - ISCPC
>>
>>      Tatiana Khramtsova -  Registrar Stakeholder Group
>>
>>      Avri Doria - Non Commercial Stakeholder Group
>>
>>      Philip Sheppard - CBUC
>>
>>
>>
>>      ICANN Staff:
>>
>>      Glen de Saint Gery
>>
>>      Marika Konings
>>
>>      Gisella Gruber-White
>>
>>      Julie Hedlund
>>
>>
>>
>>      Absent apologies:
>>
>>      Ray Fassett - Registries Stakeholder Group
>>
>>      Mary Wong - NCUC
>>
>>      Rudi Vanscnick - At-Large
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>      Agenda and related summary
>>
>>
>>
>>      1. Clarifying the DT mandate
>>
>>
>>
>>      *         DT should draft a charter for a Standing Committee and
>> present it to the Council for approval. The term "standing" seems
>> appropriate rather than "steering" since underlining the
>>
>>      *         Reactive character of the SC (mainly) with tasks
>> related to subsequent review of improvements that have been implemented
>> from the PPSC and OSC (adopted by the council) and that presents any
>> problems. Shifting the items in question to the new SC after having
>> finished the related document/process by the PPSC/OSC and approved by
>> the council. SC should pick up issues after the group concerned (WG,
>> council etc.) has gained some experience with the process implemented.
>> Periodic (preventive) reviews may also be useful to have.
>>
>>      *         It should be acknowledged that PPSC and OSC still have
>> to finish tasks (maybe on different timescale) whereas the new SC should
>> start working on items already finished (s.a.). Expiry of PPSC/OSC
>> charters in June 2011 is obviously not acceptable.
>>
>>      *         The new SC should do the work by itself, not just
>> identify the issues and "manage" them.
>>
>>
>>
>>      2. SC charter draft
>>
>>
>>
>>      *         W.-U. Knoben shall come up with a first draft on the
>> basis of this discussion
>>
>>      *         Membership should be of broad participation of all
>> constituencies/SGs. Council members should not be excluded. Call for
>> membership as usual. Open question, whether a council member should
>> chair the new SC. Built in a mechanism to the charter in order that
>> members are being reconfirmed by their respective constituencies/SGs
>> after a certain period.
>>
>>
>>
>>      3. Timing
>>
>>
>>
>>      *         Present a status report in SF. Motion deadline for SF
>> is Feb 21 which is too early for a draft charter ready to go.
>>
>>
>>
>>      4. DT chair
>>
>>      *         Since there was no objection W.-U. Knoben shall
>> continue to chair this Drafting Team
>>
>>
>>
>>      5. Next call
>>
>>
>>
>>      *         Monday, 12 Feb, 13:00 UTC
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>      Best regards
>>      Wolf-Ulrich
>>
>>
>
>
>
>





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy