AW: AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] WG: Standing Committee Drafting Team (SC-DT)

[<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Rudi,

Maybe you didn't receive the doodle poll related to this call sent out last 
week. Sorry about. I'll take care that you'll get all information in time.

Happy to meet you in SF.


Gisella, please could you check the team list?



Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Rudi Vansnick [mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx] 
Gesendet: Montag, 21. Februar 2011 12:41
An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Cc: rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: AW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] WG: Standing Committee Drafting Team 
(SC-DT)

Dear Wolf-Ulrich,

I'm very sorry but at such short notice it is difficult to change my
agenda. As I have already a meeting scheduled at 13:30 till 14:45 it will
be difficult to participate.

I suppose I'm representing ALAC as I do not see any name from ALAC in the
actual list and I'm happy to take this task on me.

For your information i will be in San Francisco and will make time
available to meet overthere.

Kind regards,

Rudi Vansnick
President/CEO Internet Society Belgium
Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16


KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Thanks Rudi,
>
> The call will be today at 13:00 UTC (14:00 CET).
> Are you representing ALAC in this regard? The reason why I'm raising this
> question is that the new Steering Committee (and the drafting team as
> well) is targeted to deal with GNSO related improvements.
> Anyway we need broad participation and I'd be happy you could make it.
>
>
>
> Best regards
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Rudi Vansnick [mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx]
> Gesendet: Montag, 21. Februar 2011 11:00
> An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
> Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] WG: Standing Committee Drafting Team
> (SC-DT)
>
> Dear Wolf-Ulrich,
>
> I'm very sorry I couldn't make it as I was on a flight to Albania at that
> time.
>
> If I'm not wrong the date of the next call will not be 12 February as
> mentioned below, what is the date of the next call ? Is it during the
> ICANN San Francisco meeting ?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Rudi Vansnick
> President/CEO Internet Society Belgium
> Member ALAC / EURALO
> Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
>
>
> KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> Maybe you've received this mail on the other mailing list.
>>
>> I was advised that this list (gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
>> <BLOCKED::mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> ) is the one which
>> should be used for this group. That's why I'm resending the E-Mail
>> attached.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>>      Von: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
>>      Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Februar 2011 16:30
>>      An: ntfy-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
>>      Betreff: Standing Committee Drafting Team (SC-DT)
>>
>>
>>      All:
>>
>>
>>
>>      Please find attached a short summary from the call on Tuesday.
>> As promised a first raw charter draft shall follow before the next call.
>>
>>
>>
>>      ---------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>      Participants on the Call, Tuesday, 15 Feb, 13:00 - 14:00 UTC:
>>
>>      Wolf-Ulrich Knoben - ISCPC
>>
>>      Tatiana Khramtsova -  Registrar Stakeholder Group
>>
>>      Avri Doria - Non Commercial Stakeholder Group
>>
>>      Philip Sheppard - CBUC
>>
>>
>>
>>      ICANN Staff:
>>
>>      Glen de Saint Gery
>>
>>      Marika Konings
>>
>>      Gisella Gruber-White
>>
>>      Julie Hedlund
>>
>>
>>
>>      Absent apologies:
>>
>>      Ray Fassett - Registries Stakeholder Group
>>
>>      Mary Wong - NCUC
>>
>>      Rudi Vanscnick - At-Large
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>      Agenda and related summary
>>
>>
>>
>>      1. Clarifying the DT mandate
>>
>>
>>
>>      *         DT should draft a charter for a Standing Committee and
>> present it to the Council for approval. The term "standing" seems
>> appropriate rather than "steering" since underlining the
>>
>>      *         Reactive character of the SC (mainly) with tasks
>> related to subsequent review of improvements that have been implemented
>> from the PPSC and OSC (adopted by the council) and that presents any
>> problems. Shifting the items in question to the new SC after having
>> finished the related document/process by the PPSC/OSC and approved by
>> the council. SC should pick up issues after the group concerned (WG,
>> council etc.) has gained some experience with the process implemented.
>> Periodic (preventive) reviews may also be useful to have.
>>
>>      *         It should be acknowledged that PPSC and OSC still have
>> to finish tasks (maybe on different timescale) whereas the new SC should
>> start working on items already finished (s.a.). Expiry of PPSC/OSC
>> charters in June 2011 is obviously not acceptable.
>>
>>      *         The new SC should do the work by itself, not just
>> identify the issues and "manage" them.
>>
>>
>>
>>      2. SC charter draft
>>
>>
>>
>>      *         W.-U. Knoben shall come up with a first draft on the
>> basis of this discussion
>>
>>      *         Membership should be of broad participation of all
>> constituencies/SGs. Council members should not be excluded. Call for
>> membership as usual. Open question, whether a council member should
>> chair the new SC. Built in a mechanism to the charter in order that
>> members are being reconfirmed by their respective constituencies/SGs
>> after a certain period.
>>
>>
>>
>>      3. Timing
>>
>>
>>
>>      *         Present a status report in SF. Motion deadline for SF
>> is Feb 21 which is too early for a draft charter ready to go.
>>
>>
>>
>>      4. DT chair
>>
>>      *         Since there was no objection W.-U. Knoben shall
>> continue to chair this Drafting Team
>>
>>
>>
>>      5. Next call
>>
>>
>>
>>      *         Monday, 12 Feb, 13:00 UTC
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>      Best regards
>>      Wolf-Ulrich
>>
>>
>
>
>
>