<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures
- To: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>, "KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures
- From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 08:20:51 -0700
All,
I see that my message was not clear. I wasn't asking whether we should extend
beyond August 20th, just that unless there were objections we would continue
through the end of the reply comment period, which ends on 20 August, rather
than canceling the reply comment period.
I hope this is clearer and I apologize for the confusion.
Best regards,
Julie
From: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>>
Reply-To: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday, August 1, 2012 11:11 AM
To: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>>, Julie
Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>>,
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: Public Forum on Changes to Operating
Procedures
I agree with Wolf-Ulrich.
j. scott evans - head of global brand, domains & copyright - Yahoo! Inc. -
408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>
________________________________
From: "KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>"
<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>>
To: julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>;
gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 11:03 PM
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: Public Forum on Changes to Operating
Procedures
Thanks Julie.
Since there is not any objecting comment: does anybody feel it being necessary
to extend beyond 20th of August? Otherwise the implementation process could be
as usual.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
Von:
owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Julie Hedlund
Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 21:12
An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures
Dear SCI members,
The comment period on the changes to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures
ended yesterday. There was only one comment received. It was from the
Registries Stakeholder Group in support of the changes. See:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-operating-procedures-2012/.
The reply comment period begins today and extends to the 20th of August. Given
that many people may be on holiday, it might be useful to continue with the
reply period. Please let me know if you would like a different approach.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|