ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures

  • To: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>, "KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures
  • From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 08:20:51 -0700

All,

I see that my message was not clear.  I wasn't asking whether we should extend 
beyond August 20th, just that unless there were objections we would continue 
through the end of the reply comment period, which ends on 20 August, rather 
than canceling the reply comment period.

I hope this is clearer and I apologize for the confusion.

Best regards,
Julie

From: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>>
Reply-To: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday, August 1, 2012 11:11 AM
To: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>>, Julie 
Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: Public Forum on Changes to Operating 
Procedures

I agree with Wolf-Ulrich.

j. scott evans -  head of global brand, domains & copyright - Yahoo! Inc. - 
408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>


________________________________
From: "KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>" 
<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>>
To: julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>; 
gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 11:03 PM
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] AW: Public Forum on Changes to Operating 
Procedures

Thanks Julie.

Since there is not any objecting comment: does anybody feel it being necessary 
to extend beyond 20th of August? Otherwise the implementation process could be 
as usual.


Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich


________________________________
Von: 
owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
 [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Julie Hedlund
Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 21:12
An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures

Dear SCI members,

The comment period on the changes to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures 
ended yesterday.  There was only one comment received.  It was from the 
Registries Stakeholder Group in support of the changes.  See: 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-operating-procedures-2012/.

The reply comment period begins today and extends to the 20th of August.  Given 
that many people may be on holiday, it might be useful to continue with the 
reply period.  Please let me know if you would like a different approach.

Thank you very much.

 Best regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy