Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating Procedures

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Since there is no reason to alter the std comment/reply process, I recommend we 
just keep to the normal process with the normal dates.

avri

On 1 Aug 2012, at 02:03, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thanks Julie.
>  
> Since there is not any objecting comment: does anybody feel it being 
> necessary to extend beyond 20th of August? Otherwise the implementation 
> process could be as usual.
>  
> 
> Best regards 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
>  
> 
> Von: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Julie Hedlund
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 21:12
> An: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Public Forum on Changes to Operating 
> Procedures
> 
> Dear SCI members,
> 
> The comment period on the changes to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures 
> ended yesterday.  There was only one comment received.  It was from the 
> Registries Stakeholder Group in support of the changes.  See: 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-operating-procedures-2012/.
> 
> The reply comment period begins today and extends to the 20th of August.  
> Given that many people may be on holiday, it might be useful to continue with 
> the reply period.  Please let me know if you would like a different approach.
> 
> Thank you very much.
> 
>  Best regards,
> 
> Julie
> 
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director