<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Proposal for Deferral of Motions
- To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Proposal for Deferral of Motions
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:02:07 +0100
Thought I had sent this a while ago, but sent it from an unsubscribed address.
--- against option 2 ---
Can live with status quo
But I do not understand why it was narrowed down to just these two alternatives
when so much more was discussed.
avri
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|