RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] New task

["Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxx>]

It is most likely that te scop

Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Robinson [jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Received: Sunday, 23 Dec 2012, 3:51am
To: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx [KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx]; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
[gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx]
CC: 'Neuman, Jeff' [Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx]
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] New task

All,

Jeff Neuman raised a point on the GNSO Council list that the question being 
posed to the SCI should be a simpler one focussed on the general principle not 
the specific item that caused us to question the principle.  I am in agreement 
with this.

Therefore my suggestion is that the SCI focus on the essential question i.e. 
under what circumstances is it acceptable / permissible for a motion to be 
submitted to the GNSO Council when such a motion is identical to one that has 
been previously voted down by the Council.

Jeff put it well and I am support of his formulation of the question as follows.

The question should simply be "should there be any restrictions on resubmitting 
motions that previously appeared before the Council?  If so, what should those 
restrictions be and are there any exceptions?

Thank-you.


Jonathan


From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 20 December 2012 18:08
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] New task

All,

from today's council call the task attached was shifted to the SCI.
Looking forward to meeting you later
Wolf-Ulrich




________________________________

For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to 
www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.

Phoenix (602)262-5311           Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090            Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200         Silicon Valley (650)391-1380

  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying 
to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.

  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that 
if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or 
written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of 
avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.