<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] New task
- To: "KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>, "jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] New task
- From: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:24:31 +0000
I give up since my fingers keep slipping and it's holiday time for me. I'll
join the discussion in 2013. If any of you are taking time off, I wish you
peace and rest...Anne
Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Robinson [jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Received: Sunday, 23 Dec 2012, 3:51am
To: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx [KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx]; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
[gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx]
CC: 'Neuman, Jeff' [Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx]
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] New task
All,
Jeff Neuman raised a point on the GNSO Council list that the question being
posed to the SCI should be a simpler one focussed on the general principle not
the specific item that caused us to question the principle. I am in agreement
with this.
Therefore my suggestion is that the SCI focus on the essential question i.e.
under what circumstances is it acceptable / permissible for a motion to be
submitted to the GNSO Council when such a motion is identical to one that has
been previously voted down by the Council.
Jeff put it well and I am support of his formulation of the question as follows.
The question should simply be "should there be any restrictions on resubmitting
motions that previously appeared before the Council? If so, what should those
restrictions be and are there any exceptions?
Thank-you.
Jonathan
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 20 December 2012 18:08
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] New task
All,
from today's council call the task attached was shifted to the SCI.
Looking forward to meeting you later
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to
www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.
Phoenix (602)262-5311 Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090 Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200 Silicon Valley (650)391-1380
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying
to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.
In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that
if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or
written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of
avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|