RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] On SCI consensus and impasse

["Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

No, Avri, I was not alluding to any person or example; rather attempting to
make clear the inequities I see with the current standard and rationale
behind my thinking.

In response to your comment on Charter clean-up, I appreciate your support
for that work.  In any case, I expect that, once we are done, we will need
to have the GNSO Council sign-off on the revisions before they can go into
effect.

Kind regards,

RA

Ronald N. Andruff

RNA Partners, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 10:10 PM
To: Gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] On SCI consensus and impasse



On 23 Jan 2013, at 20:12, Ron Andruff wrote:

> Holding the working group hostage until that individual deems to be
satisfied, while others are not, is inequitable.  


Are you alluding to an specific example.

I find your reference to members of the group holding other members hostage,
somewhat problematic.

In terms of the charter, while I am comfortable with cleanup, I am not
comfortable with a re-write.   

avri