[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Revised language regarding suspension / termination of a PDP

["Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry Marika - I don't know why I typed "s" instead of "k" in your name - it's 
been a long week - I apologize!  Anne

[cid:447003300@09022013-0644]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP * Suite 700
One South Church Avenue * Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 * Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx> * 
www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original 
message.


________________________________
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 5:26 PM
To: 'Marika Konings'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Revised language regarding suspension / 
termination of a PDP


Marisa,
I have taken your language and condensed it a bit as well as trying to clarify 
that if there is no recommendation from the WG before the Council, then there 
would have to be a properly seconded motion in order to require the Council to 
seek public comment.

I don't think anyone was intending to completely eliminate the requirement for 
a written report when the WG was making the recommendation.  That written 
Termination Report or Suspension Report was mandatory where the recommendation 
for suspension or termination came from the WG.   That improvement was at the 
very heart of this initiative and so that language has been added back where 
you had deleted it.

On a more minor note, I also noticed that the earlier paragraphs in this same 
section refer to "PDP Team" and not "PDP Working Group".  So I changed all the 
references to PDP Team.  It seems it should be one or the other consistently 
throughout unless there is some difference I do not appreciate between a PDP 
Team and PDP WG.  I also think it would be fine for all references to be to PDP 
WG and that is the term I hear used more often.

Attached is a new Feb 8 draft with the changes accepted.  While working on 
this, I ended up losing track of the status of my redline and would appreciate 
it if you could run a comparison btween this and the language the SCI reviewed 
in its last call so that all members can see the proposed changes in my draft.

Thank you,
Anne



[cid:447003300@09022013-064B]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP * Suite 700
One South Church Avenue * Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 * Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx> * 
www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original 
message.


________________________________
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 4:10 AM
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Revised language regarding suspension / 
termination of a PDP

Dear All,

As discussed yesterday, please find attached for your review the suggested 
modifications to the last version of the language concerning the termination or 
suspension of a PDP.

With best regards,

Marika



________________________________

For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to 
www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.

Phoenix (602)262-5311           Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090            Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200         Silicon Valley (650)391-1380

  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying 
to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.

  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that 
if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or 
written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of 
avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.