<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re-Submitting a Motion: Suggestions from Sub-Group
- To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re-Submitting a Motion: Suggestions from Sub-Group
- From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:46:10 -0800
Dear SCI members,
On behalf of Sub-Group that is considering the issue of re-submitting a motion
(Anne Aikman-Scalese, Avri Doria, Thomas Rickert and Mary Wong) here are
suggested approaches for your consideration.
1. Clarify that the Conflicts of Interest issue is separate from the issue of
re-submitting a motion and the SCI has yet to discuss conflicts of interest
2. Possible Options for Addressing the Re-Submission of a Motion:
a. Leave up to discretion of the Chair
b. Set one or more high-level criteria (in this order):
1) Change in circumstance that merits the resubmission of a motion.
2) Publish the text of the re-submitted motion as of the deadline for
submission of motions (8 days prior to the next Council meeting).
3) Require a seconder of the motion from each house as a prerequisite for
placing the re-submission of the motion on the consent agenda.
4) Allow a councilor to ask for the re-submission of the motion to be taken
off the consent agenda and to request a Council vote on whether to accept the
re-submission.
These also will be available in the Adobe Connect room for discussion at our
meeting today.
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|