[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Re-Submitting a Motion: Suggestions from Sub-Group

["Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Julie.  Do we have a revised draft from Marika of the PDP suspension 
language that includes my comments and the reference that Mary and I made to a 
written Termination summary or Suspension summary?
Thank you,
Anne

[cid:278271017@20022013-1B79]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700
One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx> • 
www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original 
message.


________________________________
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 7:46 AM
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re-Submitting a Motion: Suggestions from 
Sub-Group

Dear SCI members,

On behalf of Sub-Group that is considering the issue of re-submitting a motion 
(Anne Aikman-Scalese, Avri Doria, Thomas Rickert and Mary Wong) here are 
suggested approaches for your consideration.

1.  Clarify that the Conflicts of Interest issue is separate from the issue of 
re-submitting a motion and the SCI has yet to discuss conflicts of interest

2.  Possible Options for Addressing the Re-Submission of a Motion:
a.  Leave up to discretion of the Chair
b.  Set one or more high-level criteria (in this order):
1)  Change in circumstance that merits the resubmission of a motion.
2)  Publish the text of the re-submitted motion as of the deadline for 
submission of motions (8 days prior to the next Council meeting).
3)  Require a seconder of the motion from each house as a prerequisite for 
placing the re-submission of the motion on the consent agenda.
4)  Allow a councilor to ask for the re-submission of the motion to be taken 
off the consent agenda and to request a Council vote on whether to accept the 
re-submission.

These also will be available in the Adobe Connect room for discussion at our 
meeting today.

Best regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director




________________________________

For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to 
www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.

Phoenix (602)262-5311           Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090            Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200         Silicon Valley (650)391-1380

  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying 
to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.

  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that 
if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or 
written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of 
avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.