Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Draft v2-WG Self-Assessment Questionnaire

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

On 20 Jun 2013, at 17:28, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote:

> 
> Now I am really confused about the RFP.  I thought the SCI was supposed to 
> review the new PDP process as an "Improvement Implementation issue" after 
> sufficient time has passed and that there was a feeling that sufficient time 
> has not passed.
> Anne


That ATRT2work has nothing explicitly to do with the work of this team. There 
is a broader call for investigation by the ATRT2 into the PDP in terms of 
whether it meets ICANN's needs for full stakeholder participation.

I mentioned it here because it seems relevant.  Not that there is anything for 
this group to do, unless of course the outside researcher decides that talking 
to this group is worthwhile.  I don't have a prediction.

As for blending the work of the A&T WG and this work, I can only see it in 
terms of the A&T taking whatever recommendations that come out of  ATRT2 into 
account - when they come out at the end of 2013.   Of course the ATRT2 members 
will be consulting with the public, including those working toward the A&T WG 
and I am sure there is a lot to be gleaned in those conversations.

avri