<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Draft v2-WG Self-Assessment Questionnaire
- To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Draft v2-WG Self-Assessment Questionnaire
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 20:08:01 -0400
On 20 Jun 2013, at 17:28, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote:
>
> Now I am really confused about the RFP. I thought the SCI was supposed to
> review the new PDP process as an "Improvement Implementation issue" after
> sufficient time has passed and that there was a feeling that sufficient time
> has not passed.
> Anne
That ATRT2work has nothing explicitly to do with the work of this team. There
is a broader call for investigation by the ATRT2 into the PDP in terms of
whether it meets ICANN's needs for full stakeholder participation.
I mentioned it here because it seems relevant. Not that there is anything for
this group to do, unless of course the outside researcher decides that talking
to this group is worthwhile. I don't have a prediction.
As for blending the work of the A&T WG and this work, I can only see it in
terms of the A&T taking whatever recommendations that come out of ATRT2 into
account - when they come out at the end of 2013. Of course the ATRT2 members
will be consulting with the public, including those working toward the A&T WG
and I am sure there is a lot to be gleaned in those conversations.
avri
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|