RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter Latest Version from Mikey

["Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Mikey, I think the term "final review" puts the PDP suspension out of 
bounds, too.  Anne

[X]Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700
One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx> • 
www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original 
message.


________________________________
From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:53 AM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Cc: 'Julie Hedlund'; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter Latest Version from Mikey

hi Anne,

i think "suspension of a PDP" could be stretched and tugged to just barely fit 
under the proposed (and current) charter.  i agree that "resubmission of a 
motion" is out of scope for both our current and proposed charters -- as that 
is purely a matter of Council rules of procedure.  i think taking that one on 
is an especially good example of modifying our mission to becoming the 
"standing GNSO rules committee," which we may want to avoid.

mikey

PS. i changed the subject line to Mikey -- Mickey is a mouse

On Jul 2, 2013, at 11:37 AM, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" 
<AAikman@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:


My view is that neither  the "suspension of a PDP" already completed nor the 
"resubmission of a motion" work requested by the GNSO Council is within the 
scope of this amended charter as redrafted.

 By the way in relation to the resubmission of a motion, I think GNSO changed 
the time for notifying of a motion to 10 calendar days in advance at 11:59 UTC 
or something like that.  I am sure staff can clarify.  Anne

<image001.gif>Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
Lewis and Roca LLP • Suite 700
One South Church Avenue • Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
Tel (520) 629-4428 • Fax (520) 879-4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxx> • 
www.LewisandRoca.com/Aikman<http://www.lewisandroca.com/Aikman>

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information
intended only for the individual or entity named within the message.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is prohibited.  If this communication
was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original 
message.



________________________________
From: 
owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
 
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>]
 On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 10:50 AM
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Charter -- Latest Version from Mickey

All,

For reference for our discussion tomorrow, please see the latest version of the 
SCI Charter that includes the suggested edits from Mickey.

Best regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director




________________________________

For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to 
www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.

Phoenix (602)262-5311           Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090            Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200         Silicon Valley (650)391-1380

  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying 
to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.

  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that 
if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or 
written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of 
avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.











PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: 
www.haven2.com<http://www.haven2.com>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, 
Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)




________________________________

For more information about Lewis and Roca LLP, please go to 
www.lewisandroca.com<http://www.lewisandroca.com/>.

Phoenix (602)262-5311           Reno (775)823-2900
Tucson (520)622-2090            Albuquerque (505)764-5400
Las Vegas (702)949-8200         Silicon Valley (650)391-1380

  This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying 
to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone.

  In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that 
if this email contains any tax advice, such tax advice was not intended or 
written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of 
avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.