Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] GNSO WG Definitions of Decision-Making Levels

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Apologies for having missed the F2F meeting in Singapore, but how do these
changes address the specific question that was put forward by the GNSO
Council on behalf of the IGO/INGO PDP WG: 'and specifically requests the
SCI to review and, if deemed appropriate, recommend revised or additional
language to apply to situations where working groups may reach
sufficient consensus against a particular proposal such that the
appropriate consensus level cannot accurately be described as No
Consensus/Divergence'? The additions / edits may be helpful clarifications
but they seem to go beyond the scope of the specific question put forward
to the SCI. But maybe I am missing something, so I am looking forward to
discussing this further on the call later today.

Best regards,

Marika

On 08/04/14 13:12, "Amr Elsadr" <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I¹ve taken a stab at some very slight word-smithing on the last draft of
>the WG consensus levels discussed at our F2F in Singapore. I¹ve tried to
>capture the comments made, and a little more and look forward to a
>discussion on this during today¹s call.
>
>I have admittedly done this only today, so have not had time to consult
>with the rest of the sub-team. Greg, Thomas, CintraŠ, my apologies.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Amr
>

Attachment: default.xml
Description: XML document

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature