[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Proposal Regarding GNSO WG Definitions of Decision-Making Levels
All:
I am sending to the entire SCI a proposal relating to the "consensus (etc.)
against" issue we have been discussing. This was circulated to the subteam
(Amr, Cintra, Thomas and Mary) earlier this week. Based on discussions in and
after Singapore, this proposal does not change the Decision-Making Levels
language in the text of the PDP Manual. Instead, this proposal contains a new
explanatory footnote appended to the list of existing consensus levels.
(Please note that I have included the discussion of "divergence" in the
footnote because a few people in the IGO/INGO Working Group insisted that the
situation should be described as "Divergence" even though it was clear that a
strong majority of the Working Group had coalesced around a position actively
opposing a recommendation. While their position was (in my opinion) more
political than logical, I thought it should be dealt with nonetheless.)
I suggest that, if and when this is handed up to the GNSO Council, we should
note to the Council that we found a number of notable linguistic/drafting flaws
in the consensus levels. However, after prior revisions and deliberation, we
restrained ourselves from fixing these flaws at this time so that the
"consensus against" issue could be dealt with in isolation and with clarity. I
suggest that we recommend that the drafting issues be dealt with in the near
future.
I look forward to your comments.
Best regards,
Greg
Gregory S. Shatan
Partner
Reed Smith LLP
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
212.549.0275 (Phone)
917.816.6428 (Mobile)
212.521.5450 (Fax)
gshatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.reedsmith.com
* * *
This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered
confidential and may well be legally privileged. If you have received it in
error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply
e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or
use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other
person. Thank you for your cooperation.
* * *
To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we
inform you that, unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax
advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1)
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state
and local provisions or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
party any tax-related matters addressed herein.
Disclaimer Version RS.US.20.10.00
Attachment:
Current Consensus Levels - Revised.DOCX |