Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Consensus Call - GNSO Working Groups Consensus Levels document

[Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I also support the addition of the footnote on behalf of NCUC.

Thanks.

Amr

On May 7, 2014, at 12:42 AM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ron, Mary, et al – On behalf of IPC, we support.  We also note that it is 
> within the purview of SCI to undertake the longer term study of WG Consensus 
> levels and perhaps this should be mentioned when reporting to Council. 
>  
> Many thanks to Greg for all his hard work on this.
> Anne
>  
> <image001.gif>
> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | Suite 700
> One South Church Avenue | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
> AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx | www.LRRLaw.com
>  
> <image002.jpg>
> Lewis and Roca LLP is now Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP.
>  
> From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 12:11 PM
> To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Consensus Call - GNSO Working Groups 
> Consensus Levels document
>  
> Dear all,
>  
> Attached is the latest draft of the proposal for SCI submission to the GNSO 
> Council relating to the language in the GNSO Working Group Guidelines 
> concerning Consensus Levels for Working Groups. 
>  
> As discussed on the various SCI calls and related emails, the SCI will be 
> proposing that the actual text currently in the Guidelines concerning the 
> Consensus Levels remain unchanged for now; instead, the SCI will recommend 
> that a footnote be added to explain that the Levels can and do include 
> designations of “consensus against”. In addition, the SCI will also recommend 
> to the Council that the current Consensus Levels text be reviewed as soon as 
> feasible.
>  
> Please indicate if you, on behalf of your stakeholder groups/constituencies, 
> support or do not support the current draft proposal and language.
>  
> Thanks and cheers
> Mary
>  
> Mary Wong
> Senior Policy Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
> Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx
>  
> * One World. One Internet. *
> 
> 
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this 
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or 
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended 
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any 
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and 
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic 
> Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. 
> 
> In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that 
> if this message or any attachments contains any tax advice, such tax advice 
> was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any 
> taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the 
> taxpayer.