Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Consensus Call - GNSO Working Groups Consensus Levels document
Dear all, This reminder is being sent on behalf of Ron and Cintra, SCI Chair and Vice-Chair - please indicate (if you have not already done so) whether your respective SG/C supports or does not support the proposed SCI recommendation relating to the WG Consensus Levels (see further below and the proposal sent out for the formal Consensus Call on 30 April). For the record, the SCI operates on a Full Consensus basis. As such, we will need responses one way or the other from: * the Registries Stakeholder Group * The Registrars Stakeholder Group * NomCom appointees * ISP constituency * NPOC constituency * Noncommercial Stakeholder Group The BC, IPC and NCUC have expressed support for the recommended proposal. Please accept my apologies if you have previously sent a response on behalf of your group that I missed. If possible, please provide your response by COB on Friday 23 May. Thank you! Cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx * One World. One Internet. * From: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wednesday, May 7, 2014 at 11:01 AM To: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Consensus Call - GNSO Working Groups Consensus Levels document > Hi, > > I also support the addition of the footnote on behalf of NCUC. > > Thanks. > > Amr > > On May 7, 2014, at 12:42 AM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Ron, Mary, et al On behalf of IPC, we support. We also note that it is >> within the purview of SCI to undertake the longer term study of WG Consensus >> levels and perhaps this should be mentioned when reporting to Council. >> >> Many thanks to Greg for all his hard work on this. >> Anne >> >> <image001.gif> >> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel >> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | Suite 700 >> One South Church Avenue | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 >> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 >> AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx | www.LRRLaw.com <http://www.lrrlaw.com/> >> >> >> <image002.jpg> >> Lewis and Roca LLP is now Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP. >> >> >> From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mary Wong >> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 12:11 PM >> To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Consensus Call - GNSO Working Groups >> Consensus Levels document >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> >> Attached is the latest draft of the proposal for SCI submission to the GNSO >> Council relating to the language in the GNSO Working Group Guidelines >> concerning Consensus Levels for Working Groups. >> >> >> As discussed on the various SCI calls and related emails, the SCI will be >> proposing that the actual text currently in the Guidelines concerning the >> Consensus Levels remain unchanged for now; instead, the SCI will recommend >> that a footnote be added to explain that the Levels can and do include >> designations of ³consensus against². In addition, the SCI will also recommend >> to the Council that the current Consensus Levels text be reviewed as soon as >> feasible. >> >> >> Please indicate if you, on behalf of your stakeholder groups/constituencies, >> support or do not support the current draft proposal and language. >> >> >> Thanks and cheers >> Mary >> >> >> Mary Wong >> Senior Policy Director >> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) >> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 >> Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx >> >> >> * One World. One Internet. * >> >> >> >> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the >> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this >> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or >> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended >> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or >> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have >> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by >> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any >> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and >> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic >> Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. >> >> In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that >> if this message or any attachments contains any tax advice, such tax advice >> was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any >> taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the >> taxpayer. >> >> Attachment:
smime.p7s
|