FW: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Consensus Call - GNSO Working Groups Consensus Levels document

["Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Mary,

Please see below regarding Consensus Call related to WG Consensus levels 
proposal from SCI.  I responded for IPC May 6 and Avri weighed in May 7 I think.



Thank you,

Anne



Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel

Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | Suite 700

One South Church Avenue

Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725

AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx | www.LRRLaw.com



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 11:57 AM
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Consensus Call - GNSO Working Groups 
Consensus Levels document









On 06-May-14 18:42, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote:

> Ron, Mary, et al – On behalf of IPC, we support.  We also note that it

> is within the purview of SCI to undertake the longer term study of WG

> Consensus levels and perhaps this should be mentioned when reporting

> to Council.





With all of the GNSO Review work about to start, I would not be too quick to 
jump into this particular activity.  As a council member my inclination would 
be to defer this subject to the GNSO review.



But as a SCI member, I have no objection to the request being made, it is just 
one I am not inclined toward. I am especially uncomfortable with the topic for 
the SCI as it is all tied up in the PDP by-laws and the nature of the house 
structure.



avri



________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message 
or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent 
responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient 
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. 
The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be 
privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the 
intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy 
Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that if 
this message or any attachments contains any tax advice, such tax advice was 
not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for 
the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.