RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan Robinson

[Terri Agnew <terri.agnew@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

 

We will send invite out shortly with call details.

 

Kind regards,

 

Terri Agnew

 

From: owner-gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 1:01 PM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Avri Doria'; 'Thomas Rickert'; Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
Cc: Lori Schulman; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx; Glen de Saint Géry;
gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-secs] Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council
Chair Jonathan Robinson
Importance: High

 

Anne,

 

I saw your request for the meeting the first time, so no need to emphasize
it.  I was simply suggesting a possible more expedient way to address
consensus on the letter and still meet the deadline, particularly since
members agreed at the last meeting to finalize the letter on the list.  I
have copied the GNSO Secretariat since they set up the calls.  Of course
they also are on this list, so in future if you have requests for meetings
you can simply request that the Secretariat should set them up. 

 

However, in the notification I will also ask the Secretariat to request that
members should RSVP by COB Monday, 26 January as to whether or not they can
attend the call on Tuesday as this is very late notice to get a call on
people's schedules.  If there is not a quorum for a call on Tuesday then you
can consider whether to cancel the call prior to the meeting.  I suggest
this as a courtesy to avoid canceling at the beginning of a call and so that
people can take it off their schedules ahead of time.

 

I'll note also that with respect to comments on the letter I think Avi is
the only one who has commented either way, and you had given COB Monday as
the deadline for comments.  Thus, perhaps there may be other comments
forthcoming.

 

Best regards,

Julie

 

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

 

From: <Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
Date: Friday, January 23, 2015 1:33 PM
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
>, 'Avri Doria' <avri@xxxxxxx <mailto:avri@xxxxxxx> >, 'Thomas Rickert'
<rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx> >, Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx> >
Cc: Lori Schulman <lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx <mailto:lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx> >,
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> "
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> >,
Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx> >
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair
Jonathan Robinson

 

Julie,

Although I think everyone preferred to finalize via the list, there was no
one expressing disagreement to the proposed changes as Avri has done.  As
far as I know, Avri is still the primary and I do not believe that
addressing her issues on the list is going to result in meeting the
deadline.  

 

PLEASE ISSUE THE INVITATION FOR THE CALL NEXT TUESDAY AS REQUESTED.  I would
appreciate your doing this today.

 

Thank you,

Anne

 




Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel


Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | 


One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611


(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725


AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>  | www.LRRLaw.com
<http://www.lrrlaw.com/> 

        
        

 

        
 

 

From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 2:52 PM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Avri Doria'; 'Thomas Rickert'; Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
Cc: Lori Schulman; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> ; Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair
Jonathan Robinson
Importance: High

 

Hi Anne,

 

If I recall correctly I think some people raised concerns on the call that
they would not be available next week and also that it was a very busy time
for various constituencies as they prepare for Singapore.  I would
respectfully suggest that perhaps you could encourage people to provide
their thoughts on the list.  In particular, it would be helpful if each
primary member could indicate whether he or she supports the letter as is,
or if not, suggest changes that would enable them to support it.

 

Best regards,

Julie

 

From: <Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
Date: Thursday, January 22, 2015 4:01 PM
To: 'Avri Doria' <avri@xxxxxxx <mailto:avri@xxxxxxx> >, 'Thomas Rickert'
<rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx> >, Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx> >
Cc: Lori Schulman <lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx <mailto:lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx> >,
Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> >,
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> "
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> >,
Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx> >
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair
Jonathan Robinson

 

Thanks Avri. Shall we schedule a call on January 27 to discuss?  As per the
mp3, we did not have any disagreement on these points during the call, but
we can certainly set up a call January 27 to discuss.  Sounds like we need
to do that.  Will staff please proceed accordingly?

Thank you,

Anne

 




Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel


Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | 


One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611


(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725


AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>  | www.LRRLaw.com
<http://www.lrrlaw.com/> 

        
        

 

        
 

 

From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 1:11 PM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Thomas Rickert'; Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
Cc: Lori Schulman; Julie Hedlund; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> ; Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair
Jonathan Robinson

 

Hi,

Belated apologies for missing the meeting.

Was there a consensus call on the four issues that are being included?  I
know we have not done one on the list and was wondering if one had been
taken during the call.

A council liaison I would like to know that for my report.  I will of course
faithfully faithfully any letter the SCI wishes sent.

As a primary member I have doubts on whether I would have participated in a
positive consensus on these four items, though I might have allowed them to
pass without comment. Specifically on #3, I have been explicit in not
supporting a review of consensus levels while the GNSO review was ongoing.
I also do not see the point of #2, as we could have done this before but
opted not to.  So while I would understand the council requesting such a
comment, I do not understand the SCI asking to redo work it already did and
has had accepted. Yes we had a difference of opinion on whether to include
resubmitted notions and that may have been a good reason to withhold our
recommendation.  But since we went ahead, I do not understand the SCI asking
to reopen this issue.

I can not support the letter as it stands.

thanks

avri



I have always been against, number 3, for example until such time as we knew
the results of any reorganizational review.

On 22-Jan-15 14:07, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote:

Dear all,

Please see attached the revised letter to GNSO Council based on Tuesday’s
SCI conference call.  If you have any comments, please supply them to the
list prior to 1300 UTC Monday,  January 26.  

 

Avri, again, as Council liaison for SCI, we are requesting 15 minutes on the
schedule for Working Sessions in Singapore for you to present this letter to
Council.  (I am unable to attend and SCI will not be meeting separately
there.)

 

Thank you,

Anne 

 




Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel


Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | 


One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611


(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725


AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>  | www.LRRLaw.com
<http://www.lrrlaw.com/> 

        
        

 

        
 

 

From: Thomas Rickert [mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 2:32 AM
To: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
Cc: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; Lori Schulman; Julie Hedlund;
gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> ;
Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] NCPH Intersessional 2015 Recordings &
Transcripts

 

Same here. Sorry!

 

Best

Thomas

 

Am 21.01.2015 um 09:44 schrieb WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx> >:

 

Sorry all that I missed the call! I came back late after the Frankfurt
meeting.


Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

 

From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> 

Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 10:16 PM

To: 'Lori Schulman' <mailto:lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx>  ; Julie Hedlund
<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>  ; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> 

Cc: 'Glen de Saint Géry' <mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx> 

Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: NCPH Intersessional 2015 Recordings &
Transcripts

 

Many thanks Lori.  We will revise the draft letter to GNSO Council in
accordance with comments received during today’s meeting.

 

Separately, and specifically directed at Avri as Council liaison, staff
advised today that certain SCI matters were put “on hold” last week by
Council.  (Thanks Mary for this info.)  Staff also advised that it is part
of the function of Council liaison to provide SCI with information as to
action taken by Council affecting its work. 

 

Amr mentioned that GNSO Council meeting minutes are not available until the
next GNSO Council meeting and as such, may not be timely.  

 

Thanks everyone who participated in today’s call.  We will be circulating
the redraft of the letter soon.  We want to be sure our letter and request
for time on the Council’s work schedule for Singapore reaches Council in a
timely fashion and preferably well before February 1.

Anne

 


<image002.gif>

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel


Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | 


One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611


(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725


AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>  | www.LRRLaw.com
<http://www.lrrlaw.com/> 

        
        

 

        
 

 

From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lori Schulman
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:11 PM
To: Julie Hedlund; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> 
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] NCPH Intersessional 2015 Recordings &
Transcripts

 

Dear All,

 

Below is the link for last week’s intersessional.   I didn’t find the joint
letter re GNSO review posted separately.

 

 

https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=51416553

 

Lori

 


Lori S. Schulman · General Counsel
1703 North Beauregard Street

Alexandria, VA  22311-1714

P 703-575-5678 · Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx <mailto:Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx> 
<image003.jpg>

 

 
 
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of
 
the person(s) to whom it has been sent, and may contain information that is
 
confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient or
 
have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy,
distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please notify
the
sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message and
any
 
attachments. ASCD makes no guarantee that this e-mail is error or virus
free.

 

  _____  


This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. 

 

 

  _____  


This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. 

 

 


  _____  



This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. 

 


  _____  



This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature