Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan Robinson

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I have no idea what letter people are referring to at this time. 
I do not, however, feel at all comfortable with the way the process is
being run. 
And the only letter I have approved is the one that Mary provided. 

SCI has always been a deliberative body.  We discuss things more that
once and allow time to ask questions, especially of those who cannot
attend a meeting.  Several groups have adopted a practice of never
making a decsion in one meeting.  This seems like a excellent
practices.  And while in the past that has never been a problem, we seem
to be adopting a new pace that may make such a practice necessary. 

As for consensus, we tried to achieve that with discussion.

As for the report, having thought about it a bit more, I think you
should be able to make you own report remotely Anne, as required by the
charter.  Or perhaps Lori as vice chair can do it. I will give a brief
liaison report.

thanks

avri

On 27-Jan-15 16:22, Angie Graves wrote:
> Dear Anne,
>
> I agree with your revised letter to Jonathan.
>
> Thank you for your time on this.
>
> Angie
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Lori Schulman <lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx
> <mailto:lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     Dear Anne,
>
>      
>
>     Thank you for the concise run down of events and positions.  I
>     agree with your proposal on how to proceed with the report and the
>     request for direction.
>
>      
>
>     Lori
>
>
>
>       
>
>     * *
>