RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan Robinson

["Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Avri.  I think SCI has 15 minutes in the agenda so how shall we split 
the time for our respective reports?  (Lori and I can work out who will give 
the SCI Chair (or Vice Chair) report based on time zones etc.)  I am copying 
Glen with respect to your recommendation that both the Chair (or Vice Chair) 
and the Council Liaison provide a report to Council.

Let us know if you have further thoughts after review of the January 20 mp3 
and/or transcript.  I was not previously aware of a protocol to “never make a 
decision in one meeting”.  We can certainly discuss this within SCI on our next 
call.
Anne

[cid:image001.gif@01D03A64.92D99CE0]

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel

Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |

One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725

AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> | 
www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/>








From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 3:44 PM
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan 
Robinson

Hi,

I have no idea what letter people are referring to at this time.
I do not, however, feel at all comfortable with the way the process is being 
run.
And the only letter I have approved is the one that Mary provided.

SCI has always been a deliberative body.  We discuss things more that once and 
allow time to ask questions, especially of those who cannot attend a meeting.  
Several groups have adopted a practice of never making a decsion in one 
meeting.  This seems like a excellent practices.  And while in the past that 
has never been a problem, we seem to be adopting a new pace that may make such 
a practice necessary.

As for consensus, we tried to achieve that with discussion.

As for the report, having thought about it a bit more, I think you should be 
able to make you own report remotely Anne, as required by the charter.  Or 
perhaps Lori as vice chair can do it. I will give a brief liaison report.

thanks

avri
On 27-Jan-15 16:22, Angie Graves wrote:
Dear Anne,

I agree with your revised letter to Jonathan.

Thank you for your time on this.

Angie



On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Lori Schulman 
<lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx<mailto:lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Dear Anne,

Thank you for the concise run down of events and positions.  I agree with your 
proposal on how to proceed with the report and the request for direction.

Lori






________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message 
or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent 
responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient 
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. 
The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be 
privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the 
intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy 
Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.