<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: SCI Chair's Report to Council
- To: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Julie Hedlund'" <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Avri Doria'" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "'gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx'" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: SCI Chair's Report to Council
- From: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 00:10:26 +0000
Dear SCI Members,
In addition to Angie (BC), Amr (NCUC), Wolf-Ulrich(ISPCP), and Greg(IPC), I
have had NPOC communication from Lori off-list in response to the two questions
below. (Have asked Lori to respond on the list for the record.)
Will constituencies/stakeholders who have not directly responded to the two
questions in the SCI straw poll below please do so before the beginning of the
GNSO Council Working Sessions on Saturday? This includes NCSG, RrSG, RySG, and
Nom Com.
Thank you,
Anne
[cid:image001.gif@01D04164.44F42390]
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> |
www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/>
From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 5:20 AM
To: 'Julie Hedlund'; 'Avri Doria'; 'gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx'
Cc: 'Mary Wong'
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Chair's Report to Council
Importance: High
Dear SCI members, please provide your informal responses to the two questions
below by 20:00 UTC on Thursday February 4.
Lori and I are finalizing the Chair's report to Council. Staff has prepared
some draft slides for this purpose and we will be making minor edits. For
purposes of completing these edits, it would be helpful for each member to
weigh in on the two questions below. (Please note this is an informal inquiry
- not a formal Consensus Call since these topics do not involve a formal SCI
recommendation to Council.)
1. In connection with the question of establishing a procedure for
friendly amendments in the Council Operating Procedures, should SCI undertake
this work?
2. In connection with the question of considering the application of the
10 day waiver rule to resubmission of motions in the Operating Procedures,
should SCI undertake this work?
With respect to Question 1, I have not heard any disagreement or objection in
the January 20 call or on the list, but Mary Wong is very concerned that only
three people have provided comment and feels it is quite important for SCI to
have the results of a "straw poll" on the topic of friendly amendments.
With respect to Topic 2, I understand that both Greg and Amr believe this topic
should be addressed, but Avri does not. Again, there is concern that comment
from three SCI members is incomplete.
Regarding other topics discussed in the January call and on the list since that
time, I believe it is clear that those topics come under the "periodic review"
element in our Charter and require at a minimum (1) Review and discussion of
the Westlake Report and (2) formulation of a proposed plan under the SCI's
"periodic review" responsibilities as to which we will need formal consensus
for the purpose of making a recommendation to Council. I would like to suggest
that SCI work toward adopting such a "periodic review" recommendation under its
Charter in time for the Buenos Aires meeting but realize that others may have
different thoughts. This can be explored further in future calls.
Thank you,
Anne
[cid:image001.gif@01D04164.44F42390]
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> |
www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/>
From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:07 AM
To: 'Julie Hedlund'; 'Avri Doria';
gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan
Robinson
Thanks Julie. I will work with Lori on this as we hear further thoughts on the
list.
Anne
[cid:image001.gif@01D04164.44F42390]
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> |
www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/>
From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 9:17 AM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Avri Doria';
gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan
Robinson
Anne,
I can assist by preparing a couple of slides. I can look back at your message,
but ideally the slides should just have very brief bullet points. If you and
Lori have some brief points that you would like to send me separately in an
email I can incorporate these into slides in the template we are using for
Singapore presentations.
Best regards,
Julie
From: <Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:01 AM
To: 'Avri Doria' <avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>>,
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan
Robinson
Hi Avri,
Lori and I will schedule the SCI Chair's Report for the first ten minutes of
the time with Council. (Lori, I will come to you off list regarding this.)
Thanks to staff for pointing out that the SCI Chair must report at each ICANN
public meeting.
Many thanks Avri for your thorough and sincere explanation of your thinking on
the best SCI working method. This deserves further discussion as to our
working process in the next SCI call. I honestly don't think there were any
inconsistent positions taken and again the mp3 may assist on that point. Have
you had time to listen to it or to read the transcript?
Regarding the remainder of your observations, I will come back later today with
some further thoughts for discussion on the points you have made.
Have a great day in all respects and thank you for your active contributions to
the list.
Anne
________________________________
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message
or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender.
The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be
privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy
Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
________________________________
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message
or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender.
The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be
privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy
Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
________________________________
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message
or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender.
The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be
privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy
Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
![GIF image](gifzCr0mkv57k.gif)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|