Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: SCI Chair's Report to Council

[Lori Schulman <lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx>]

For the record, I agree that we should address both issues.

Lori Schulman

On Feb 5, 2015, at 7:12 PM, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" 
<AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Dear SCI Members,

In addition to Angie (BC), Amr (NCUC), Wolf-Ulrich(ISPCP), and Greg(IPC), I 
have had NPOC communication from Lori off-list in response to the two questions 
below.  (Have asked Lori to respond on the list for the record.)

Will constituencies/stakeholders who have not directly responded to the two 
questions in the SCI straw poll below please do so before the beginning of the 
GNSO Council Working Sessions on Saturday?  This includes NCSG, RrSG, RySG, and 
Nom Com.
Thank you,
Anne

<image001.gif>

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel

Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |

One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725

AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> | 
www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/>







From: 
owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
 [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Aikman-Scalese, 
Anne
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 5:20 AM
To: 'Julie Hedlund'; 'Avri Doria'; 
'gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>'
Cc: 'Mary Wong'
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Chair's Report to Council
Importance: High

Dear SCI members, please provide your informal responses to the two questions 
below by 20:00 UTC on Thursday February 4.

Lori and I are finalizing the Chair’s report to Council.  Staff has prepared 
some draft slides for this purpose and we will be making minor edits.  For 
purposes of completing these edits, it would be helpful for each member to 
weigh in on the two questions below.  (Please note this is an informal inquiry  
– not a formal Consensus Call since these topics do not involve a formal SCI 
recommendation to Council.)


1.       In connection with the question of establishing a procedure for 
friendly amendments in the Council Operating Procedures, should SCI undertake 
this work?



2.       In connection with the question of considering the application of the 
10 day waiver rule to resubmission of motions in the Operating Procedures, 
should SCI undertake this work?


With respect to Question 1, I have not heard any disagreement or objection in 
the January 20 call or on the list, but Mary Wong is very concerned that only 
three people have provided comment and feels it is quite important for SCI to 
have the results of a “straw poll” on the topic of friendly amendments.

With respect to Topic 2, I understand that both Greg and Amr believe this topic 
should be addressed, but Avri does not.  Again, there is concern that comment 
from three SCI members is incomplete.

Regarding other topics discussed in the January call and on the list since that 
time, I believe it is clear that those topics come under the “periodic review” 
element in our Charter and require at a minimum (1) Review and discussion of 
the Westlake Report and (2) formulation of a proposed plan under the SCI’s 
“periodic review” responsibilities as to which we will need formal consensus 
for the purpose of making a recommendation to Council.  I would like to suggest 
that SCI work toward adopting such a “periodic review” recommendation under its 
Charter in time for the Buenos Aires meeting but realize that others may have 
different thoughts.   This can be explored further  in future calls.

Thank you,
Anne

<image001.gif>

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel

Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |

One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725

AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> | 
www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/>








From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:07 AM
To: 'Julie Hedlund'; 'Avri Doria'; 
gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan 
Robinson

Thanks Julie.  I will work with Lori on this as we hear further thoughts on the 
list.
Anne

<image001.gif>

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel

Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |

One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

(T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725

AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> | 
www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/>








From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 9:17 AM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Avri Doria'; 
gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan 
Robinson

Anne,

I can assist by preparing a couple of slides.  I can look back at your message, 
but ideally the slides should just have very brief bullet points.  If you and 
Lori have some brief points that you would like to send me separately in an 
email I can incorporate these into slides in the template we are using for 
Singapore presentations.

Best regards,
Julie

From: <Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 11:01 AM
To: 'Avri Doria' <avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>>, 
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Jonathan 
Robinson

Hi Avri,
Lori and I will schedule the SCI Chair’s Report for the first ten minutes of 
the time with Council.  (Lori, I will come to you off list regarding this.)  
Thanks to staff for pointing out that the SCI Chair must report at each ICANN 
public meeting.

Many thanks Avri for your thorough and sincere explanation of your thinking on 
the best SCI working method.  This  deserves further discussion as to our 
working process in the next SCI call.  I honestly don’t think there were any 
inconsistent positions taken and again the mp3 may assist on that point.  Have 
you had time to listen to it or to read the transcript?

Regarding the remainder of your observations, I will come back later today with 
some further thoughts for discussion on the points you have made.

Have a great day in all respects and thank you for your active contributions to 
the list.
Anne




________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message 
or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent 
responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient 
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. 
The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be 
privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the 
intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy 
Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message 
or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent 
responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient 
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. 
The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be 
privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the 
intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy 
Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message 
or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent 
responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient 
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. 
The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be 
privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the 
intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy 
Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.



This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of

the person(s) to whom it has been sent, and may contain information that is

confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient or

have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy,
distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please notify the
sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message and any

attachments. ASCD makes no guarantee that this e-mail is error or virus free.