Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015
Dear Anne, Dear all, I’m also in favor of integrating Mary’s (Amr’s) changes to the text before posting it to the list. I will be traveling from today 14:00 UTC till Thursday 9:00am AGT. Safe travels and see you in BA. Rudi Vansnick Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/> rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxxx Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32 > Op 16-jun.-2015, om 20:24 heeft Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> het > volgende geschreven: > > Hi Anne, > > We have some language that had been previously suggested by Mary and which > also is the language Amr retrieved prior to our meeting. I'm just checking > to see if we want to make any changes to it before we (or Amr) send it to the > list. > > Thanks, > Julie > > From: <Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>> > Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 2:14 PM > To: Terri Agnew <terri.agnew@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:terri.agnew@xxxxxxxxx>>, > "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>" > <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>> > Cc: "gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>" <gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx > <mailto:gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>> > Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 > June 2015 > >> Hi everyone. I had understood that Amr and staff would be working together >> to put out a general e-mail asking whether there is a generally favorable >> view toward the issue of giving resubmitted motions the benefit of the 10 >> day waiver rule and that this general e-mail might include at least some old >> language drafted previously by Mary to spark our discussion for this >> Saturday morning’s meeting at 7:45 am in the GNSO Council meeting room. >> >> Could staff please advise as to status of this effort? >> Thank you, >> Anne >> >> <image001.gif> >> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel >> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | >> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 >> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 >> AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> | www.LRRLaw.com >> <http://www.lrrlaw.com/> >> >> >> From: owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> >> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Terri Agnew >> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 6:05 PM >> To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June >> 2015 >> >> Dear All, >> Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements >> Implementation meeting held on Thursday, 04 June 2015: >> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-04jun15-en.mp3 >> <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-04jun15-en.mp3> >> On page:http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#jun >> <http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#jun> >> (transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page) >> >> Attendees: >> Anne Aikman Scalese – IPC – Primary - Chair >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben – ISPCP - Primary >> Rudi Vansnick – NPOC - Primary >> Amr Elsadr – NCUC - Primary >> Avri Doria – NCSG – Primary >> Lori Schulman – IPC - Alternate >> >> Apologies: >> None >> >> ICANN Staff: >> Julie Hedlund >> Mary Wong >> Terri Agnew >> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** >> Let me know if you have any questions. >> Thank you. >> Kind regards, >> Terri Agnew >> Adobe Chat Transcript 04 June 2015 >> Terri Agnew:Dear all, welcome to the SCI call on the 4th June 2015 >> Lori Schulman:Where is the mute symbol? >> Terri Agnew:Lori your mic isn't active >> Lori Schulman:good. I have a bad habit of not muting. >> Amr Elsadr:I can hear you Anne. >> Terri Agnew:Lost audio, one moment rejoining >> Lori Schulman:Am I still disqualified? Are there ever exceptions? >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:is it the wish of anybody (eg council) that the >> resubmitted motion should benefit from the rule? >> Rudi Vansnick:quid if motion content/context is changed ? >> Amr >> Elsadr:http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg01201.html >> <http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg01201.html> >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:sorry Anne, I overread it. It's now clear, thanks >> Amr Elsadr:This is the language Mary suggested adding to 3.3.2: >> "Resubmitted motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating >> Procedures after the Submission Deadline must meet these requirements in >> addition to those detailed in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible for >> consideration by the GNSO Council under this Section 3.3.2." >> Rudi Vansnick:what's the feeling of the councils in this ? in favor ? >> Avri Doria:i think clarity was the issue. and the fact that some SCI >> members were unhappy with the way our last recommendation had left it. most >> were ok with it. >> Avri Doria:put after it haad been poked at enough and after the SCI asked >> the council to please make this an issue we could work on, we did. >> Mary Wong:Yes, per what Amr is saying - first question is whether 10-day >> waiver rule can/should apply to resubmitted motions >> Rudi Vansnick:if the 10-day waiver is applied, a resubmitted motion could >> indefinitely be resubmitted ? >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:@Mary, I thought that is the wish, so it should happen?? >> Rudi Vansnick:thanks Mary >> Mary Wong:@Anne, that works too - Chair's call :) >> Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: I don't think the 10-day waiver rule affects how many >> times a motion may be resubmitted. >> Julie Hedlund:@Amr and Rudi: I think whether a motion can be resubmitted >> is governed by the rules in 4.3.3. >> Amr Elsadr:@Anne: Correct. >> Amr Elsadr:Thanks Julie. >> Mary Wong:Yes, a fresh start >> Amr Elsadr:For some reason, I seem to be the only one who thinks we did >> actually talk a great deal about this. :) >> Avri Doria:Amr, you did talk about it a lot. But there weren't any great >> discussions. >> Rudi Vansnick:@Mary: +1 >> Avri Doria:thee were one or two people who kept bringing it up , but the >> discussion never stuck. >> Amr Elsadr:Greg engaged in this discussion quite a bit. Discussions took >> place both on-list and on calls, if I recall correctly. >> Mary Wong:@Amr, that's right - there was discussion but people seemed to >> have different ideas about what the agreed conclusion was. >> Amr Elsadr:@Anne: I'm sorry, could you clarify your concern again. Not >> sure I got it. >> Rudi Vansnick:perhaps we are now in a state where we need to finalize the >> direction >> Avri Doria:i'm ambivalent on this issue. >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:staff should draft >> Avri Doria:i dont mind allowing them to draft, i am not sure about asking >> them to draft. >> Lori Schulman:There is no harm in starting drafting. We are not approving >> anything. >> Julie Hedlund:@Anne: That is correct. The next meeting is in Buenos Aires. >> Lori Schulman:I agree with Mary's point that a draft would be a starting >> point only and a good thing to react o. >> Lori Schulman:yes. agree. >> Julie Hedlund:@Anne: It is the 20th early in the morning. >> Mary Wong:The usual "happy" hour :) >> Rudi Vansnick:at 7am ? ;-) >> Amr Elsadr:@Mary: Happy hour isn't supposed to be all about coffee!! >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Saturday 7:45 >> Julie Hedlund:@Wolf-Ulright I think that's correct. >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:GNSO starts at 9:00 >> Amr Elsadr:Am I not getting through? >> Terri Agnew:@Amr your audio is cutting out >> Amr Elsadr:The way I see it, both the request and the explanation should >> be provided. >> Mary Wong:@Amr, staff will send you something to review before sending to >> the list >> Amr Elsadr:@Mary: I'll dig up what I came up with and fwd it to you as >> well. >> Mary Wong:Gerat, thanks! >> Amr Elsadr:BTW..., I won't be in BA, but will participate in the SCI >> meeting remotely. >> Mary Wong:@Amr, so it's confirmed you can't come? :( >> Amr Elsadr:Have personal stuff I need to sort out at that time. Sorry I >> won't be there. >> Rudi Vansnick:thanks Anne for chairing this meeting >> Mary Wong:Sorry we won't see you >> Julie Hedlund:@Anne: Mary and I are drafting some slides. >> Julie Hedlund:We will send them to you to review. >> Amr Elsadr:Thanks Anne and all. Bye. >> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Thanks Anne and bye to all >> Anne Aikman-Scalese - IPC member:Thank you. >> >> >> >> >> >> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the >> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this >> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or >> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended >> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or >> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you >> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by >> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any >> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and >> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the >> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. > <image001.gif> Attachment:
signature.asc
|