Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015
Anne, In the past we have discussed and confirmed Chair/Vice Chair nominations/volunteers during a meeting. So, we could put the position of the Vice Chair and Rudi's offer first on the agenda for Saturday's meeting, if you agree. Kind regards, Julie From: <Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:07 PM To: 'Rudi Vansnick' <rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx> Cc: Terri Agnew <terri.agnew@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June 2015 > Fantastic news Rudi very helpful. Yesterday my plane had to make an > emergency landing and for a few hours I thought I would not be able to make it > before Saturday morning. Very good to know there will now be a Vice Chair in > place. > > Will staff please advise the procedure for making this official assuming > there are no other volunteers? > > Anne > > Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel > Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | > One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 > (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 > AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx | www.LRRLaw.com <http://www.lrrlaw.com/> > > > > > From: Rudi Vansnick [mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 7:59 AM > To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne > Cc: Terri Agnew; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx; Julie > Hedlund > Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 > June 2015 > Importance: High > > Dear Anne, > > Dear all, > > > > As I did not see anyone volunteering for the vice-chair seat, I¹m willing to > jump in. Having finished a PDP WG, and ending my ISOC Board mandate, I¹m > having some more free time to make available for this task. > > > > See you all in BA. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Rudi Vansnick > > Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) > > www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org> > > > > rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxxx > > Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 > > Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32 > > > > >> >> Op 16-jun.-2015, om 15:24 heeft Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> het >> volgende geschreven: >> >> >> Hi Anne, >> >> >> >> We have some language that had been previously suggested by Mary and which >> also is the language Amr retrieved prior to our meeting. I'm just checking >> to see if we want to make any changes to it before we (or Amr) send it to the >> list. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Julie >> >> >> >> From: <Aikman-Scalese>, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 2:14 PM >> To: Terri Agnew <terri.agnew@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" >> <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: "gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 >> June 2015 >> >> >>> >>> Hi everyone. I had understood that Amr and staff would be working together >>> to put out a general e-mail asking whether there is a generally favorable >>> view toward the issue of giving resubmitted motions the benefit of the 10 >>> day waiver rule and that this general e-mail might include at least some old >>> language drafted previously by Mary to spark our discussion for this >>> Saturday morning¹s meeting at 7:45 am in the GNSO Council meeting room. >>> >>> >>> >>> Could staff please advise as to status of this effort? >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Anne >>> >>> >>> <image001.gif> >>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel >>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | >>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 >>> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 >>> AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx | www.LRRLaw.com <http://www.lrrlaw.com/> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx >>> [mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Terri Agnew >>> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 6:05 PM >>> To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx >>> Cc: gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] MP3 recording of the SCI meeting - 04 June >>> 2015 >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements >>> Implementation meeting held on Thursday, 04 June 2015: >>> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-04jun15-en.mp3 >>> >>> On page:http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#jun >>> <http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#jun> >>> (transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page) >>> >>> >>> >>> Attendees: >>> >>> Anne Aikman Scalese IPC Primary - Chair >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben ISPCP - Primary >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick NPOC - Primary >>> >>> Amr Elsadr NCUC - Primary >>> >>> Avri Doria NCSG Primary >>> >>> Lori Schulman IPC - Alternate >>> >>> >>> >>> Apologies: >>> >>> None >>> >>> >>> >>> ICANN Staff: >>> >>> Julie Hedlund >>> >>> Mary Wong >>> >>> Terri Agnew >>> >>> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** >>> >>> Let me know if you have any questions. >>> >>> Thank you. >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Terri Agnew >>> Adobe Chat Transcript 04 June 2015 >>> >>> Terri Agnew:Dear all, welcome to the SCI call on the 4th June 2015 >>> >>> Lori Schulman:Where is the mute symbol? >>> >>> Terri Agnew:Lori your mic isn't active >>> >>> Lori Schulman:good. I have a bad habit of not muting. >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:I can hear you Anne. >>> >>> Terri Agnew:Lost audio, one moment rejoining >>> >>> Lori Schulman:Am I still disqualified? Are there ever exceptions? >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:is it the wish of anybody (eg council) that the >>> resubmitted motion should benefit from the rule? >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick:quid if motion content/context is changed ? >>> >>> Amr >>> Elsadr:http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-improvem-impl-sc/msg01201.html >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:sorry Anne, I overread it. It's now clear, thanks >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:This is the language Mary suggested adding to 3.3.2: >>> "Resubmitted motions made pursuant to Section 4.3.3 of these Operating >>> Procedures after the Submission Deadline must meet these requirements in >>> addition to those detailed in Section 4.3.3 in order to be eligible for >>> consideration by the GNSO Council under this Section 3.3.2." >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick:what's the feeling of the councils in this ? in favor ? >>> >>> Avri Doria:i think clarity was the issue. and the fact that some SCI >>> members were unhappy with the way our last recommendation had left it. most >>> were ok with it. >>> >>> Avri Doria:put after it haad been poked at enough and after the SCI asked >>> the council to please make this an issue we could work on, we did. >>> >>> Mary Wong:Yes, per what Amr is saying - first question is whether 10-day >>> waiver rule can/should apply to resubmitted motions >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick:if the 10-day waiver is applied, a resubmitted motion could >>> indefinitely be resubmitted ? >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:@Mary, I thought that is the wish, so it should >>> happen?? >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick:thanks Mary >>> >>> Mary Wong:@Anne, that works too - Chair's call :) >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: I don't think the 10-day waiver rule affects how many >>> times a motion may be resubmitted. >>> >>> Julie Hedlund:@Amr and Rudi: I think whether a motion can be resubmitted >>> is governed by the rules in 4.3.3. >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:@Anne: Correct. >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:Thanks Julie. >>> >>> Mary Wong:Yes, a fresh start >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:For some reason, I seem to be the only one who thinks we did >>> actually talk a great deal about this. :) >>> >>> Avri Doria:Amr, you did talk about it a lot. But there weren't any great >>> discussions. >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick:@Mary: +1 >>> >>> Avri Doria:thee were one or two people who kept bringing it up , but the >>> discussion never stuck. >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:Greg engaged in this discussion quite a bit. Discussions took >>> place both on-list and on calls, if I recall correctly. >>> >>> Mary Wong:@Amr, that's right - there was discussion but people seemed to >>> have different ideas about what the agreed conclusion was. >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:@Anne: I'm sorry, could you clarify your concern again. Not >>> sure I got it. >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick:perhaps we are now in a state where we need to finalize the >>> direction >>> >>> Avri Doria:i'm ambivalent on this issue. >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:staff should draft >>> >>> Avri Doria:i dont mind allowing them to draft, i am not sure about asking >>> them to draft. >>> >>> Lori Schulman:There is no harm in starting drafting. We are not approving >>> anything. >>> >>> Julie Hedlund:@Anne: That is correct. The next meeting is in Buenos >>> Aires. >>> >>> Lori Schulman:I agree with Mary's point that a draft would be a starting >>> point only and a good thing to react o. >>> >>> Lori Schulman:yes. agree. >>> >>> Julie Hedlund:@Anne: It is the 20th early in the morning. >>> >>> Mary Wong:The usual "happy" hour :) >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick:at 7am ? ;-) >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:@Mary: Happy hour isn't supposed to be all about coffee!! >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Saturday 7:45 >>> >>> Julie Hedlund:@Wolf-Ulright I think that's correct. >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:GNSO starts at 9:00 >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:Am I not getting through? >>> >>> Terri Agnew:@Amr your audio is cutting out >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:The way I see it, both the request and the explanation should >>> be provided. >>> >>> Mary Wong:@Amr, staff will send you something to review before sending to >>> the list >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:@Mary: I'll dig up what I came up with and fwd it to you as >>> well. >>> >>> Mary Wong:Gerat, thanks! >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:BTW..., I won't be in BA, but will participate in the SCI >>> meeting remotely. >>> >>> Mary Wong:@Amr, so it's confirmed you can't come? :( >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:Have personal stuff I need to sort out at that time. Sorry I >>> won't be there. >>> >>> Rudi Vansnick:thanks Anne for chairing this meeting >>> >>> Mary Wong:Sorry we won't see you >>> >>> Julie Hedlund:@Anne: Mary and I are drafting some slides. >>> >>> Julie Hedlund:We will send them to you to review. >>> >>> Amr Elsadr:Thanks Anne and all. Bye. >>> >>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Thanks Anne and bye to all >>> >>> Anne Aikman-Scalese - IPC member:Thank you. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the >>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this >>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or >>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended >>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or >>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you >>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by >>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any >>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and >>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the >>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. >>> <image001.gif> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the >>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this >>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or >>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended >>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or >>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you >>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by >>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any >>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and >>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the >>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. >> Attachment:
image001.gif Attachment:
smime.p7s
|
