ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call

  • To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Angie Graves <angie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
  • From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 15:43:30 +0000

Dear Anne and SCI members,

Would you like us to schedule a call for the 9th?  If so we'll need to get
the notice out today.

Kind regards,
Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

From:  WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To:  WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:  Friday, July 3, 2015 5:20 AM
To:  Angie Graves <angie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne"
<AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:  Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>,
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>, Mary
Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>, Nathalie Peregrine
<nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:  Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call

> Thanks Anne,
>  
> for me either date may be difficult to cover depending on time, since I¹m
> travelling through China which is UTC + 8 hrs.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
>  
> From: Angie Graves <mailto:angie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:38 AM
> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Julie Hedlund <mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>  ;
> mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx ; Mary Wong
> <mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>  ; Nathalie Peregrine
> <mailto:nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>  
> Thank you, Anne, for the update.
>  
> I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially
> problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.
>  
> Angie
>  
>  
>  
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> Dear SCI Members,
>> 
>> We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our discussion of
>> 
>> (1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and
>> 
>> (2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to motions.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in the GNSO
>> Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion regarding the
>> Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted
>> motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri respectively to lay
>> out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and "Con"(Avri).
>> 
>> Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA which I
>> encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose problems for
>> those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to Paris.  Personally I
>> am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to chair.  Please advise your
>> preference.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> Anne
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>> 
>> Of Counsel
>> 
>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>> 
>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700
>> 
>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>> 
>> (T) 520.629.4428 <tel:520.629.4428>  | (F) 520.879.4725 <tel:520.879.4725>
>> 
>> AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx | www.LRRLaw.com <http://www.LRRLaw.com>
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic
>> Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>  


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy