Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call

[Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Do we have a call scheduled for tomorrow? I have another commitment on hold 
until this one is confirmed. Would be helpful to know as soon as possible.

Thanks.

Amr

On Jul 6, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Dear Anne and SCI members,
> 
> Would you like us to schedule a call for the 9th?  If so we'll need to get 
> the notice out today.  
> 
> Kind regards,
> Julie
> 
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
> 
> From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Friday, July 3, 2015 5:20 AM
> To: Angie Graves <angie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" 
> <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, 
> "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>, Mary 
> Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>, Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
> 
>> Thanks Anne,
>>  
>> for me either date may be difficult to cover depending on time, since I’m 
>> travelling through China which is UTC + 8 hrs.
>> 
>> Best regards
>> 
>> Wolf-Ulrich
>> 
>>  
>> From: Angie Graves
>> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:38 AM
>> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
>> Cc: Julie Hedlund ; mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx ; Mary Wong ; 
>> Nathalie Peregrine
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>>  
>> Thank you, Anne, for the update.
>>  
>> I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially 
>> problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.
>>  
>> Angie
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> 
>> wrote:
>>> Dear SCI Members,
>>> We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our discussion of
>>> (1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and
>>> (2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to 
>>> motions.
>>>  
>>> You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in the 
>>> GNSO Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion regarding 
>>> the Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.
>>>  
>>> With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted 
>>> motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri respectively to lay 
>>> out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and "Con"(Avri). 
>>> Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA which I 
>>> encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.
>>>  
>>> Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose problems for 
>>> those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to Paris.  Personally 
>>> I am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to chair.  Please advise your 
>>> preference.
>>>  
>>> Thank you,
>>> Anne
>>>  
>>>  
>>> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>>> Of Counsel
>>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
>>> One South Church Avenue Suite 700
>>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
>>> AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx | www.LRRLaw.com
>>>  
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
>>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this 
>>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or 
>>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended 
>>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
>>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you 
>>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
>>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any 
>>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and 
>>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the 
>>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. 
>>