Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call

[Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am assuming that we have no call tomorrow.

I never received any timely notice of one.


Ken Stubbs


On 7/7/2015 8:19 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do we have a call scheduled for tomorrow? I have another commitment on hold 
> until this one is confirmed. Would be helpful to know as soon as possible.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
> On Jul 6, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Dear Anne and SCI members,
> >
> > Would you like us to schedule a call for the 9th?  If so we'll need to get the 
> > notice out today.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Julie
> >
> > Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
> >
> > From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Friday, July 3, 2015 5:20 AM
> > To: Angie Graves <angie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" 
> > <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" 
> > <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>, Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>, Nathalie Peregrine 
> > <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
> >
> > > Thanks Anne,
> > >   
> > > for me either date may be difficult to cover depending on time, since I’m travelling through China which is UTC + 8 hrs.
> > > Best regards
> > >
> > > Wolf-Ulrich
> > >
> > >   
> > > From: Angie Graves
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:38 AM
> > > To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
> > > Cc: Julie Hedlund ; mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx ; Mary Wong ; 
> > > Nathalie Peregrine
> > > Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
> > >   
> > > Thank you, Anne, for the update.
> > >   
> > > I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.
> > >   
> > > Angie
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Dear SCI Members,
> > > > We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our discussion of
> > > > (1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and
> > > > (2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to motions.
> > > >   
> > > > You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in the GNSO Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion regarding the Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.
> > > >   
> > > > With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri respectively to lay out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and "Con"(Avri).
> > > > Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA which I 
> > > > encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.
> > > >   
> > > > Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose problems for those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to Paris.  Personally I am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to chair.  Please advise your preference.
> > > >   
> > > > Thank you,
> > > > Anne
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > > Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
> > > > Of Counsel
> > > > Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
> > > > One South Church Avenue Suite 700
> > > > Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
> > > > (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
> > > > AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx | www.LRRLaw.com
> > > >   
> > > >   
> > > >
> > > > This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
> > > > individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message 
> > > > or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent 
> > > > responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient 
> > > > you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
> > > > message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
> > > > communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. 
> > > > The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be 
> > > > privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the 
> > > > intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy 
> > > > Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
> > >