Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call

[Rudi Vansnick <rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>]

I’m available on the 23rd so if needed we can schedule the call on that day.

Rudi Vansnick
Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC)
www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org/>

rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxxx
Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16
Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32



> Op 7-jul.-2015, om 17:19 heeft Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> het 
> volgende geschreven:
> 
> Sorry Julie but I was in all day meetings on site with a client yesterday and 
> did not realize you needed to be advised by Monday to schedule a Thursday 
> call.   If you get in a deadline situation like this again, please call 
> either Cynthia Cover at 520-629-4402 or Denise Moryoqui at 520-629-4435.  
> They can always find me.
>  
> If Rudi can chair the call on July 23, then I think the call should proceed 
> on that date.  (I will be on a plane.)
> Thank you,
> Anne
>  
> <image001.gif>
> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
> One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
> (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725
> AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> | www.LRRLaw.com 
> <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>
>  
> From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>] 
> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 8:43 AM
> To: WUKnoben; Angie Graves; Aikman-Scalese, Anne
> Cc: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>; 
> Mary Wong; Nathalie Peregrine
> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>  
> Dear Anne and SCI members,
>  
> Would you like us to schedule a call for the 9th?  If so we'll need to get 
> the notice out today.  
>  
> Kind regards,
> Julie
>  
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>  
> From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Friday, July 3, 2015 5:20 AM
> To: Angie Graves <angie@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:angie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>, 
> "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>>
> Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
> "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>" 
> <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
> Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>>, Nathalie 
> Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>  
> Thanks Anne,
>  
> for me either date may be difficult to cover depending on time, since I’m 
> travelling through China which is UTC + 8 hrs.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
>  
> From: Angie Graves <mailto:angie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:38 AM
> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Julie Hedlund <mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> ; 
> mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> ; Mary Wong 
> <mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx> ; Nathalie Peregrine 
> <mailto:nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] SCI - next call
>  
> Thank you, Anne, for the update.
>  
> I personally am available Thursday July 9, as well as the potentially 
> problematic dates of Thursday, July 16, and Thursday, July 23.
>  
> Angie
>  
>  
> <image002.png>
>  
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Dear SCI Members,
> 
> We should  be setting up our call schedule and continuing our discussion of
> 
> (1) application of the 10 day waiver rule to resubmitted motions and
> 
> (2)  GNSO Operating Procedures with regard to friendly amendments to motions.
> 
>  
> 
> You may have all noticed that the friendly amendment issue arose in the GNSO 
> Council public meeting in BA in connection with the motion regarding the 
> Issues Report for a next round of gTLDs.
> 
>  
> 
> With respect to the application of the 10-day waiver rule to resubmitted 
> motions, Rudi had a very good idea to ask Amr and Avri respectively to lay 
> out their positions on the list "Pro" (Amr) and "Con"(Avri). 
> 
> Rudi also provided some informal thoughts after our meeting in BA which I 
> encourage him to share on the list in response to this message.
> 
>  
> 
> Thursday July 9 is a  possible call date.  July 16 could pose problems for 
> those on CCWG - Accountability who will be traveling to Paris.  Personally I 
> am unavailable July 23 but Rudi may be able to chair.  Please advise your 
> preference.
> 
>  
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Anne
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
> 
> Of Counsel
> 
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP |
> 
> One South Church Avenue Suite 700
> 
> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
> 
> (T) 520.629.4428 <tel:520.629.4428> | (F) 520.879.4725 <tel:520.879.4725>
> AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx> | www.LRRLaw.com 
> <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this 
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or 
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended 
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any 
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and 
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic 
> Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>  
> 
> 
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this 
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or 
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended 
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any 
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and 
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic 
> Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.