ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Sub Team B Action Item/Scenarios for the SCI on Chair/Vice Chair Elections

  • To: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxx>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Re: Sub Team B Action Item/Scenarios for the SCI on Chair/Vice Chair Elections
  • From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 18:36:10 +0000

Anne,

Thanks very much for the helpful feedback.  Staff will include them in the 
document we put in the Adobe Connect room tomorrow — along with any other 
comments we may receive.

Kind regards,
Julie

From:  "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxx>
Date:  Wednesday, March 23, 2016 at 2:21 PM
To:  Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" 
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:  RE: Sub Team B Action Item/Scenarios for the SCI on Chair/Vice Chair 
Elections

Julie et al,

I have some preliminary comments from IPC Leadership for SCI consideration and 
discussion as shown inline in red text below.  (These are not final positions – 
just questions and comments.)

Anne

 

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
520.629.4428 office
520.879.4725 fax
AAikman@xxxxxxxx
_____________________________
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
lrrc.com
 

From:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 1:46 PM
To: gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Sub Team B Action Item/Scenarios for the SCI 
on Chair/Vice Chair Elections

 

Dear SCI members,

 

The Sub Team B deliberated yesterday on the remaining issue relating to the 
Chair/Vice Chair elections.  They present the following action item and 
possible scenarios, including pros and cons, to the SCI for consideration and 
discussion at the meeting on Thursday, 24 March.  Also for consideration is a 
revised draft election timeline.

 

Best regards.

Julie

 

Julie Hedlund, Director, SSAC Support

 

Remaining Issue to Address on Chair/Vice Chair Elections

 

ISSUE 2: Is there a gap to be addressed when the Vice Chairs' terms end at the 
same time as that of the Chair, and no Chair is conclusively elected by that 
time?

Discussion points: The primary goal is to have a successful election of a Chair 
and a simple solution. The options should give preference to the continuation 
of the Vice Chairs if they are available to continue (not term-limited). In 
case there is no incumbent Vice Chair available then the designation should be 
made by the related House. Designation by both Houses of a non-voting NCA to 
act as interim Chair in the absence of an available Vice-Chair should be done 
only as a possible last resort (subject to possible conditions from the NomCom).

 

Action Item--Possible Scenarios and Suggestions in Order of Priority:

 

SCENARIO 1: A new GNSO Council Chair is not elected, but both Vice Chairs are 
continuing on the Council.

 

Suggestion: “In the case where no Chair is conclusively elected, the two Vice 
Chairs shall jointly oversee the Chair election and conduct Council business 
until such time as a new Chair is elected.”

Pros: Simplest solution with minimal changes to the GNSO Operating Procedures.  
Used in Dublin.

Cons: Are there concerns with the Vice Chairs conducting Council business?

 

SCENARIO 2: A new GNSO Council Chair is not elected, but one Vice Chair is 
continuing on the Council, while the other Vice Chair’s term on the Council is 
ending.  If one Vice Chair seat is being vacated, the relevant House should 
appoint an Interim Vice Chair to work with the continuing Vice Chair in the 
other House to conduct Council business.

 

Suggestion: “In the case where one of Vice-Chair's' term on the Council ends at 
the same time as the Chair, and no Chair is conclusively elected, the remaining 
Vice Chair shall oversee the Chair election and conduct Council business until 
such time as a new Chair is elected.”

Pros: A simple solution with minimal changes to the GNSO Operating Procedures.  
Similar to the procedure in Dublin.

Cons: One one House is represented in the Vice Chair position.  Are there 
concerns with one Vice Chair conducting Council business?

 

SCENARIO 3: A new GNSO Council Chair is not elected in the first round, and 
neither of the two Vice Chairs is continuing on the Council. It should be clear 
that an appointed Interim Vice Chair is not prohibited from continuing as Vice 
Chair after the Council Chair election is concluded, provided the relevant 
House agrees on that Vice Chair continuing.  “their service in those roles 
would end” should be clarified.

 

Suggestion: “In the case where both Vice-Chairs’ terms on the Council end at 
the same time as the Chair, and no Chair is conclusively elected, this 
procedure would apply: Each House should designate a new or continuing 
cCouncilor, which may include the voting and non-voting NCAs, to temporarily 
fill the role of Vice Chair on an interim basis, not as an elected Vice Chair. 
These individuals will co-chair the Chair election and conduct Council 
business. Once the election is completed their service in those roles would 
end. Candidates for Chair would not be eligible to serve as designated Interim 
Vice Chairs, to avoid potential conflicts of interest.”

Pros: Avoids changes to the Bylaws or a Special Circumstance vote.

Cons: Not clear if there are concerns from the Council or the NomCom for the 
non-voting NCAs to be included, or conducting Council business.  Question as to 
how long each House has to do this before we default to Scenario 4.

 

SCENARIO 4: A new GNSO Council Chair is not elected, neither of the two Vice 
Chairs is continuing on the Council, and the Houses do not designate Interim 
Vice Chairs.

 

Suggestion: “if both Houses should fail to temporarily fill the role of Vice 
Chair on an interim basis, a non-voting NCA will be designated Interim Chair to 
oversee the election and conduct Council business until such time as a Chair is 
elected. The reference should be to “the” non-voting NCA since there is only 
one.  An inexperienced incoming non-voting NCA conducting Council business may 
be a concern but this scenario is a “last resort” and may also provide 
motivation for the Houses to appoint Interim Vice Chairs quickly as noted by 
Amr and Sara in chat on Monday.  Important to specify at what point Scenario 4 
takes effect, i.e. how much time do the Houses have to appoint Vice Chairs in 
Scenario 3?

Pros: Avoids changes to the Bylaws or a Special Circumstance vote.

Cons: Are there concerns from the Council or the NomCom for a non-voting NCA to 
be in the role of the Chair and conducting business.


This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message 
or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent 
responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient 
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. 
The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be 
privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the 
intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy 
Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. 

Attachment: image003.png
Description: PNG image

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy