<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Notes/Actions: SCI Meeting 24 March 2016
- To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Notes/Actions: SCI Meeting 24 March 2016
- From: Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 23:20:57 +0100
Thanks Julie,
I agree to this analysis. I understand that further discussion shall continue
on SCI- rather than subtract level.
Regards
Wolf-Ulrich
Sent from my personal phone
> Am 24.03.2016 um 21:36 schrieb Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Dear SCI members,
>
> Please see below the notes/actions captured from the SCI meeting held on 24
> March. Please let us know if you have any questions or comments. During
> today’s call it was agreed that discussion could continue on the list
> concerning these notes/actions. I’ve included the suggestions provided by
> IPC, as these were included in today’s discussion. The suggested changes for
> your review are in red/brackets as indicated below.
>
> Staff will separately send a notice for a call in two weeks on Thursday, 07
> April at the usual time of 1800 UTC.
>
> Kind regards,
> Julie
>
> Notes/Actions re Remaining Issue on Chair/Vice Chair Elections:
>
> ISSUE 2: Is there a gap to be addressed when the Vice Chairs' terms end at
> the same time as that of the Chair, and no Chair is conclusively elected by
> that time?
>
> SCENARIO 1: A new GNSO Council Chair is not elected, but both Vice Chairs are
> continuing on the Council.
> Suggestion: “In the case where no Chair is conclusively elected, the two Vice
> Chairs shall jointly oversee the Chair election and conduct Council business
> until such time as a new Chair is elected.”
> Pros: Simplest solution with minimal changes to the GNSO Operating
> Procedures. Used in Dublin.
> Cons: Are there concerns with the Vice Chairs conducting Council business?
>
> Notes: There were no objections to the Vice Chairs conducting Council
> business.
>
> **ACTION ITEM: The suggestion above is accepted.
>
> SCENARIO 2: A new GNSO Council Chair is not elected, but one Vice Chair is
> continuing on the Council, while the other Vice Chair’s term on the Council
> is ending.
> IPC suggestion: If one Vice Chair seat is being vacated, the relevant House
> should appoint an Interim Vice Chair to work with the continuing Vice Chair
> in the other House to conduct Council business.
>
> Suggestion: “In the case where one of Vice-Chair's terms on the Council ends
> at the same time as the Chair, and no Chair is conclusively elected, [OPTION
> 1: the remaining Vice Chair shall oversee the Chair election and conduct
> Council business until such time as a new Chair is elected] OR [OPTION 2: the
> House with a vacant Vice-Chair position shall designate an Interim Vice Chair
> to join the continuing Vice Chair would to oversee the Chair eletion and
> conduct Council business. The deadline for the vacant House to designate its
> Interim Vice Chair is 10 calendar days following the Council meeting at which
> no Chair was conclusively elected [OR: 14 calendar days following the Council
> meeting at which no Chair was conclusively elected] [OR: 1 week prior to the
> next scheduled GNSO Council meeting.]
>
> Pros: A simple solution with minimal changes to the GNSO Operating
> Procedures. Similar to the procedure in Dublin.
> Cons: One one House is represented in the Vice Chair position. Are there
> concerns with one Vice Chair conducting Council business? [Note: The
> previously noted disadvantage would no longer apply if the other House can
> designate an Interim Vice Chair.]
>
> Notes: There were no objections to the Vice Chairs (including an Interim
> Vice Chair designated by a House) conducting Council business.
>
> Question: What is the time limit for the vacant House to to designate an
> Interim Vice Chair? Note the three options suggested during the call: 1) 10
> calendar days after the failed Chair election; 2) 14 calendar days after the
> failed Chair election; or 3) 1 week prior to the next scheduled GNSO Council
> meeting.
>
> ** ACTION ITEM: Review additional text in red/brackets above and indicate
> which deadline option you prefer.
>
> SCENARIO 3: A new GNSO Council Chair is not elected in the first round, and
> neither of the two Vice Chairs is continuing on the Council.
> IPC Suggestion: should be clear that an appointed Interim Vice Chair is not
> prohibited from continuing as Vice Chair after the Council Chair election is
> concluded, provided the relevant House agrees on that Vice Chair continuing.
> “their service in those roles would end” should be clarified.
>
> Suggestion: “In the case where both Vice-Chairs’ terms on the Council end at
> the same time as the Chair, and no Chair is conclusively elected, this
> procedure would apply: Each House should designate a new or continuing
> Councilor, which may include the voting and non-voting NCAs, to temporarily
> fill the role of Vice Chair on an interim basis, not as an elected Vice
> Chair. The deadline for each House to designate its Interim Vice Chair is 10
> calendar days following the Council meeting at which no Chair was
> conclusively elected [OR: 14 calendar days following the Council meeting at
> which no Chair was conclusively elected] [OR: 1 week prior to the next
> scheduled GNSO Council meeting.] The Designated Interim Vice Chairs will
> co-chair the Chair election and conduct Council business until such time as a
> Chair is conclusively elected. Once the election is completed their service
> in those roles would end. Candidates for Chair will not be eligible to serve
> as Designated Interim Vice Chairs, to avoid potential conflicts of interest.
> [However, Interim Vice Chairs are not prohibited from being appointed as
> continuing Vice Chairs by their respective Houses following a successful
> Chair election.]
>
> Pros: Avoids changes to the Bylaws or a Special Circumstance vote.
> Cons: Not clear if there are concerns from the Council or the NomCom for the
> non-voting NCAs to be included, or conducting Council business.
>
> Notes:
> - Strike “non-voting” from the NCA option.
> - Add "The deadline for each House to designate its Interim Vice Chair is 10
> calendar days following the Council meeting at which no Chair was
> conclusively elected OR: 14 calendar days following the Council meeting at
> which no Chair was conclusively elected OR: 1 week prior to the next
> scheduled GNSO Council meeting”.
> - After “potential conflicts of interest” add, “However, Interim Vice Chairs
> are not prohibited from being appointed as continuing Vice Chairs by their
> respective Houses following a successful Chair election."
>
> ** ACTION ITEM: Review additional text in red/brackets above and indicate
> which deadline option you prefer.
>
> SCENARIO 4: A new GNSO Council Chair is not elected, neither of the two Vice
> Chairs is continuing on the Council, and the Houses do not designate Interim
> Vice Chairs. Suggestion: “If both Houses should fail to temporarily fill the
> role of Vice Chair on an interim basis, [the] non-voting NCA will be
> designated Interim Chair to oversee the election and conduct Council business
> until such time as a Chair is conclusively elected. The deadline for each
> House to designate its Interim Vice Chair is 10 calendar days following the
> Council meeting at which no Chair was conclusively elected [OR: 14 calendar
> days following the Council meeting at which no Chair was conclusively
> elected] [OR: 1 week prior to the next scheduled GNSO Council meeting]" IPC
> Suggestion: The reference should be to “the” non-voting NCA since there is
> only one. An inexperienced incoming non-voting NCA conducting Council
> business may be a concern but this scenario is a “last resort” and may also
> provide motivation for the Houses to appoint Interim Vice Chairs quickly as
> noted by Amr and Sara in chat on Monday. Important to specify at what point
> Scenario 4 takes effect, i.e. how much time do the Houses have to appoint
> Vice Chairs in Scenario 3?
>
> Pros: Avoids changes to the Bylaws or a Special Circumstance vote.
> Cons: Are there concerns from the Council or the NomCom for a non-voting NCA
> to be in the role of the Chair and conducting business?
>
> Notes: Insert the suggested deadlines for the Houses to designate the
> Interim Vice Chairs and change reference relating to “the non-voting NCA".
>
> ** ACTION ITEM: Review additional text in red/brackets above and indicate
> which deadline option you prefer.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|