ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-improvem-impl-sc]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER DEADLINE EXTENDED: Consensus Call: Current Practice in Relation to Motions

  • To: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] REMINDER DEADLINE EXTENDED: Consensus Call: Current Practice in Relation to Motions
  • From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:17:36 +0000

Hi Amr,

You are very welcome.  Shortly I’ll send a note that the Consensus Call is 
ended.  There were no comments or objections.

Kind regards,
Julie




On 4/26/16, 9:12 AM, "owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx on behalf of Amr 
Elsadr" <owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx on behalf of 
aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>Hi,
>
>Just wanted to thank folks again for the deadline extension. Very much 
>appreciated.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Amr
>
>> On Apr 25, 2016, at 11:23 PM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear SCI members,
>> 
>> As agreed at the SCI meeting last week the deadline on this consensus call 
>> is extended through TODAY Monday, 25 April.
>> 
>> As agreed on the SCI call on 07 April, the attached document, CONSENSUS 
>> CALL-GNSO Operating Procedures Proposed Revision Relating to Motions & 
>> Amendments 07 April 2016, is being circulated for a formal Consensus Call.  
>> The document is the proposed revision to the GNSO Operating Procedures to 
>> include the new text on submitting, seconding, and amending motions.
>> 
>> Background:
>>      • On 05 March 2015 the SCI submitted to the GNSO Council a Review 
>> Request (see attached) concerning the fact that there are currently no 
>> formal procedures on (i) whether, how and by whom a properly submitted 
>> motion is to be seconded, and (ii) treatment of proposed amendments to such 
>> motions as either “friendly” or “unfriendly”.    The Review Request was one 
>> of two that the Council approved at its meeting on 16 April 2015. In the 
>> attached Review Request the GNSO Council asked that the SCI codify the 
>> existing customary practices of the GNSO Council and consider new processes 
>> to govern the seconding of motions and amendments to motions.  
>>      • On 09 October 2015 the SCI agreed on a documentation of the Current 
>> Practice Relating to Motions and sent a letter (attached) along with the 
>> original Review Request and the documentation to Jonathan Robinson, GNSO 
>> Council Chair.  
>>      • In December 2015 the SCI established a Sub Team A — Sara Bockey, 
>> Angie Graves, Wolf-Ulrich Knoben, and Lawrence Olawale-Roberts, and Rudi 
>> Vansnick — to review the current practice and the Sub Team submitted its 
>> recommendations to the SCI on 02 March 2016.  The SCI discussed the 
>> recommendations in Marrakech on 05 March and asked staff to draft revisions 
>> to the GNSO Operating Procedures per the recommendations.  
>>      • On 07 April the SCI discussed the draft revisions and asked staff to 
>> submit them to the SCI for a Consensus Call.
>> If there are no objections by Monday, 25 April (deadline extended from 21 
>> April), the language will be presumed to be accepted by Full Consensus.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Julie 
>> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>> <CONSENSUS CALL-GNSO Operating Procedures Proposed Revision Relating to 
>> Motions & Amendments 07 April 2016.docx><CONSENSUS CALL-GNSO Operating 
>> Procedures Proposed Revision Relating to Motions & Amendments 07 April 
>> 2016.pdf><SCI Letter to GNSO Council Chair Concerning Current Practice in 
>> Relation to Motions 09 Oct 2015.pdf><SCI Review Request - Motions - 5 Mar 
>> 2015 v2.pdf>
>
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy