<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Notes/Actions: SCI Meeting 21 April 2016
- To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Notes/Actions: SCI Meeting 21 April 2016
- From: Sara Bockey <sbockey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:56:30 +0000
Hi Julie,
Sure, more specifically, the timing of those coming in and voting, but I think
I just found what I was looking for.
Thanks!
Sara
From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Monday, April 25, 2016 at 3:46 PM
To: Sara Bockey <sbockey@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:sbockey@xxxxxxxxxxx>>,
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Notes/Actions: SCI Meeting 21 April 2016
Hi Sara,
Can you clarify what you mean by voting/eligibility/election timing? During
the discussion on last week's call it was agreed that the deadline for
Scenarios 2, 3, and 4 was 14 calendar days for the vacant House/each House to
designate its Interim Vice Chair. But perhaps that’s not the timing you are
referencing? There also was discussion of the election timeline on previous
calls. I did not attach the final version with the notes below, but I’ve
attached it here.
Kind regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
From: Sara Bockey <sbockey@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:sbockey@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Monday, April 25, 2016 at 6:39 PM
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>>,
"gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: Sara Bockey <sbockey@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:sbockey@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Notes/Actions: SCI Meeting 21 April 2016
Hi All,
I was looking over notes/emails regarding Sub Team B and have a question. I
seem to recall some discussions re voting/eligibility/election timing maybe a
month or two ago, but did we land on a conclusion? Or perhaps we still have
plans to discuss further? If anyone recalls and doesn’t mind refreshing my
memory, it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Sara
From:
<owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>>
on behalf of Julie Hedlund
<julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 1:30 PM
To: "gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Notes/Actions: SCI Meeting 21 April 2016
Dear SCI members,
Please see below the notes/actions captured from the SCI meeting held on 21
April. Please let us know if you have any questions or comments. Staff will
separately send a notice for the extension on the Consensus Call as requested
below. The GNSO Secretariat also will send a notice for a call in two weeks on
Thursday, 05 May at the usual time of 1800 UTC.
Kind regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
Notes/Actions from 21 April SCI Meeting:
1. Process Relating to Motions & Amendments
Discussion: There was a request from Amr Elsadr to extend the deadline of the
Consensus Call through Monday, 25 April. There were no objections to this
request. Staff suggested that both these revisions to the GNSO Operating
Procedures and those that may result from the Chair/Vice Chair discussion could
be combined in one Public Comment period. There were no objections to the
suggestion.
ACTION ITEM: Staff will resend the consensus call with the extended deadline.
2. Chair/Vice Chair Elections:
ISSUE 2: Scenarios relating to the gap to be addressed when the Vice Chairs'
terms end at the same time as that of the Chair, and no Chair is conclusively
elected by that time.
Discussion: Proposal from IPC — even where a Vice Chair is continuing in
his/her term, the relevant House should have the ability to appoint a different
Interim Vice Chair that is otherwise eligible. The comment was that this could
be an unnecessary complication.
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Anne Aikman-Scalese will bring the comment concerning the IPC proposal
back to the IPC for consideration, and Amr Elsadr will bring the proposal and
comment back to the NCUC for consideration.
2. The SCI members should review the final proposed language below for each
scenario.
SCENARIO 1: A new GNSO Council Chair is not elected, but both Vice Chairs are
continuing on the Council.
Final Proposed Language: “In the case where no Chair is conclusively elected,
the two Vice Chairs shall jointly oversee the Chair election and conduct
Council business until such time as a new Chair is elected.”
SCENARIO 2: A new GNSO Council Chair is not elected, but one Vice Chair is
continuing on the Council, while the other Vice Chair’s term on the Council is
ending.
Final Proposed Language: “In the case where one of Vice-Chair's terms on the
Council ends at the same time as the Chair, and no Chair is conclusively
elected, the House with a vacant Vice-Chair position shall designate an Interim
Vice Chair from within this House to join the continuing Vice Chair to oversee
the Chair election and conduct Council business. The deadline for the vacant
House to designate its Interim Vice Chair is 14 calendar days following the
Council meeting at which no Chair was conclusively elected."
SCENARIO 3: A new GNSO Council Chair is not elected in the first round, and
neither of the two Vice Chairs is continuing on the Council.
Final Proposed Language: “In the case where both Vice-Chairs’ terms on the
Council end at the same time as the Chair, and no Chair is conclusively
elected, this procedure would apply: Each House should designate a new or
continuing Councilor from within its respective House, to temporarily fill the
role of Vice Chair on an interim basis, not as an elected Vice Chair. The
deadline for each House to designate its Interim Vice Chair is 14 calendar days
following the Council meeting at which no Chair was conclusively elected. The
Designated Interim Vice Chairs will co-chair the Chair election and conduct
Council business until such time as a Chair is conclusively elected. Once the
election is completed their service in those roles would end. Candidates for
Chair will not be eligible to serve as Designated Interim Vice Chairs, to avoid
potential conflicts of interest. However, Interim Vice Chairs are not
prohibited from being appointed as continuing Vice Chairs by their respective
Houses following a successful Chair election."
SCENARIO 4: A new GNSO Council Chair is not elected, neither of the two Vice
Chairs is continuing on the Council, and the Houses do not designate Interim
Vice Chairs.
Final Proposed Language: “If both Houses should fail to temporarily fill the
role of Vice Chair on an interim basis, the non-voting NCA will be designated
Interim Chair to oversee the election and conduct Council business until such
time as a Chair is conclusively elected. The deadline for each House to
designate its Interim Vice Chair is 14 calendar days following the Council
meeting at which no Chair was conclusively elected."
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|