Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Mp3, Attendance & AC Chat from SCI call 02 June 2016

[Karel Douglas <douglaskarel@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Anne,

Noted. I'll do the needful.

regards

Karel

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Karel,
>
> This language is now out for consensus call, meaning we must be contacting
> our respective constituencies to verify that we all recommend proceeding
> based on the agreed language for changes to the Operating Procedures.  If
> you did not receive this consensus call, please let staff know since we
> have a deadline of June 16 to verify or object.
>
>
>
> Anne
>
>
>
> *Anne E. Aikman-Scalese*
>
> Of Counsel
>
> 520.629.4428 office
>
> 520.879.4725 fax
>
> AAikman@xxxxxxxx
>
> _____________________________
>
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
>
> One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
>
> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>
> lrrc.com
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Karel Douglas
> *Sent:* Monday, June 06, 2016 7:32 AM
> *To:* Amr Elsadr
> *Cc:* Sara Bockey; Terri Agnew; Lori Schulman; Michelle DeSmyter;
> gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Mp3, Attendance & AC Chat from
> SCI call 02 June 2016
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> I had a chance to listen to the audio recording and I'm happy that the
> issue concerning the constitutionality of the single interim vice-chair
> conducting council business was discussed. Thanks Anne.
>
>
>
> I had raised this issue as it relates to the whether decisions can be made
> by a sole interim Vice chair where the language envisions more then one
> interim Vice Chair be appointed.
>
>
>
> I do like the suggested language proposed by Rudi , Julie etc and look
> forward to seeing the 'hard'  text and having further discussion on it at
> the next meeting. Thanks.
>
>
>
> regards,
>
>
>
> Karel
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Karel Douglas <douglaskarel@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Let me also apologise for not attending on this call. I cant recall
> receiving an invite , hopefully I'll be at the next conf call.
>
>
>
> regards
>
>
>
> Karel
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Same here. Not having a calendar invite, I had checked the GNSO Calendar
> to confirm that the SCI call was scheduled on June 2nd — just to be sure.
>
>
>
> I did however, receive an email notification from Terri on June 2nd for
> the June 16th call.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Amr
>
>
>
> On Jun 2, 2016, at 10:53 PM, Sara Bockey <sbockey@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> I’ve checked all files and I didn’t receive either of the emails.
>
>
>
> Sara
>
>
>
> *From: *Terri Agnew <terri.agnew@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Date: *Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 1:49 PM
> *To: *Sara Bockey <sbockey@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Lori Schulman <lschulman@xxxxxxxx>,
> Michelle DeSmyter <michelle.desmyter@xxxxxxxxx>, "
> gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Cc: *"gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject: *RE: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Mp3, Attendance & AC Chat from
> SCI call 02 June 2016
>
>
>
> I see Michelle sent out both the calendar invite and email invite for the
> next call taking place on 16 June at 18:00 UTC.
>
>
>
> Do you see the emails? One would have been from Michelle, the other from
> the policy calendar.
>
>
>
> Make sure to check your spam folders.
>
>
>
> Let me know.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Terri
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx
> <owner-gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Sara Bockey
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:41 PM
> *To:* Lori Schulman <lschulman@xxxxxxxx>; Michelle DeSmyter <
> michelle.desmyter@xxxxxxxxx>; gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> *Cc:* gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx; Sara Bockey <sbockey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject:* [gnso-secs] Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Mp3, Attendance &
> AC Chat from SCI call 02 June 2016
>
>
>
> I’ve had a similar issue.  While I didn’t receive a calendar invite I had
> entered today’s meeting manually to my calendar during our last meeting 2
> wks ago.  Yesterday I added the AdobeConnect link (the entry was still
> there), but this morning it was gone.  This is the second time this has
> happened but it’s only been with SCI for me. So strange!
>
>
>
> Sara
>
>
>
> *From: *<owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Lori
> Schulman <lschulman@xxxxxxxx>
> *Date: *Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 1:22 PM
> *To: *Michelle DeSmyter <michelle.desmyter@xxxxxxxxx>, "
> gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Cc: *"gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject: *[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] RE: Mp3, Attendance & AC Chat from SCI
> call 02 June 2016
>
>
>
> My apologies for today’s meeting.  Once again, the call was dropped from
> my calendar.  This seems to be an ongoing issue with ICANN invites not just
> for SCI but for other groups as well.  I will work with my IT department to
> see if the problem is  on our end.
>
>
>
> Lori S. Schulman
>
> Senior Director, Internet Policy
>
> *International Trademark Association (INTA)*
>
> +1-202-704-0408, Skype: lsschulman
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx [
> mailto:owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> <owner-gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx>]*On Behalf Of *Michelle DeSmyter
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:47 PM
> *To:* gnso-improvem-impl-sc@xxxxxxxxx
> *Cc:* gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Mp3, Attendance & AC Chat from SCI
> call 02 June 2016
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> Please find the MP3 recording of the Standing Committee on Improvements
> Implementation meeting held on *Thursday, 02 June 2016: *
> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-02jun16-en.mp3
>
>   <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-sci-02jun16-en.mp3>
>
>
>
> On page:http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#june
>
>
>
> (transcripts and recording are found on the calendar page)
>
>
>
> *Attendees:*
>
> Anne Aikman-Scalese – IPC – Primary – Vice Chair
>
> Rudi Vansnick – NPOC –Primary –Chair
>
> Sara Bockey – RrSG – Primary
>
> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben – ISPCP – Primary
>
> Angie Graves – BC – Primary
>
> Renata Aquino-Ribeiro – NCUC - Alternate
>
>
>
> *Apologies:*
>
> Amr Elsadr – NCUC – Primary
>
> Lawrence Olawale-Roberts – BC - Alternate
>
>
>
> *ICANN Staff:*
>
> Mary Wong
>
> Julie Hedlund
>
> Glen de Saint Gery
>
> Michelle DeSmyter
>
>
>
>
>
>  ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
>
> Let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Michelle DeSmyter
>
>
>
> *Adobe Chat Transcript 02 June 2016*
>
>  Michelle DeSmyter:Dear All, Welcome to the Standing Committee on
> Improvements Implementation call on Thursday, 02 June 2016 at 18:00 UTC.
>
>   Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Hi all
>
>   Sara Bockey:hello
>
>   Rudi Vansnick:welcome Wolf-Ulrich, Sara
>
>   Rudi Vansnick:waiting for the other members
>
>   Rudi Vansnick:we have apologies from Amr
>
>   Rudi Vansnick:welcome Angie, Anne
>
>   Angie Graves:Thank you.  Dialing in now
>
>   Angie Graves:My apologies for my delay
>
>   Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:now I understand the point...
>
>   Anne Aikman-Scalese:I don't have a strong opinion either way - just
> would like to know what our draft language actually means in this regard.
>
>   Anne Aikman-Scalese:We should add after "on an interim basis" the
> following (i.e. during the 14 days)
>
>   Sara Bockey:I agree with Anne on #4...I think we should be explicit in
> what is meant and currently some could view this as a grey area
>
>   Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:+1
>
>   Mary Wong:Shall we just insert "within the allotted time period" in 4,
> after "interim basis"? ie remove from 2 & 3 as noted, but iinsert in 4 for
> clarity?
>
>   Anne Aikman-Scalese:@ Mary - that would certainly also work for me -
> for clarity
>
>   Rudi Vansnick:good proposal Mary ... let's get agreement on this ...
>
>   Anne Aikman-Scalese:FYI that was my original proposal - put in 4 the
> language you are taking out of the last sentence of 3.
>
>   Mary Wong:@Anne, so it was!
>
>   Anne Aikman-Scalese:I think we can still send out for consensus call
> with changes in language made today.
>
>   Mary Wong:Two weeks from today will be 16 June, so Amr can provide a
> written update to the Council at that time, before people start traveling
> to Helsinki.
>
>   Anne Aikman-Scalese:@Mary - sounds good!
>
>   Anne Aikman-Scalese:When does GNSO meet in Helsinki?  is there a weekend
> meeting before or no such meeting?  (Not as to SCI - just a question.)
>
>   Julie Hedlund:@Anne: The GNSO Council meeting is on Thursday, and a
> short meeting on Monday for preparation, and no weekend session.
>
>   Anne Aikman-Scalese:Thank you Julie.  I have Accountability on Sunday so
> was just checking.
>
>   Michelle DeSmyter:Welcome Renata!
>
>   renata aquino ribeiro:apologies for joining so late. connection issue.
>
>   Julie Hedlund:Thanks so much everyone!
>
>   renata aquino ribeiro:Planning for Hyderabad?
>
>   Julie Hedlund:Drinks sound good :-)
>
>   Anne Aikman-Scalese:Thanks everyone.  Goodbye - hope we can all have a
> drink together in Helsinki!
>
>   renata aquino ribeiro:ok thanks
>
>   Sara Bockey:Thank you all!
>
>   Mary Wong:Thanks all!
>
>   Anne Aikman-Scalese:Thank you Rudi.
>
>   Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Thanks Rudi, Anne and all. See you in Helsinki
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>