[gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Fwd: [council] Motion for SCI Proposed Modifications Relating to Elections and Motions
Hi, In my capacity as the Council liaison to the SCI, I sent this to the Council list a few days ago, and neglected to send a copy here. Thought you should all know. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks. Amr > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [council] Motion for SCI Proposed Modifications Relating to > Elections and Motions > Date: August 16, 2016 at 3:43:40 PM GMT+2 > To: "GNSO Council List (council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hi again, > > I’ve attached a revised motion to this email. Apart from making the changes > recommended by Rubens. > > I’ve also taken the opportunity to follow up on a motion from the Council’s > July 16th meeting disbanding the SCI following the completion of the two > tasks addressed in this motion. So if the Council does vote in favour of this > motion, I thought it’d make sense to officially disband the SCI in the > process. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks. > > Amr > Attachment:
Motion for Proposed Modifications to GNSO Operating Procedures Relating to Elections and Motions 16-08-16.docx > >> On Aug 15, 2016, at 9:27 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> Hi Rubens, >> >> I certainly consider this a friendly amendment to the motion, and not too >> cliché for my taste. :) >> >> Thanks. >> >> Amr >> >>> On Aug 15, 2016, at 9:09 PM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Em 15 de ago de 2016, à(s) 16:11:000, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> escreveu: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> In my capacity as the Council liaison to the Standing Committee on >>>> Improvements, I am submitting this motion to adopt modifications to the >>>> GNSO Operating Procedures proposed by the SCI. These modifications involve >>>> both the process for GNSO Councillors to submit motions, in addition to >>>> the process to elect a GNSO Council Chair/Vice-Chair(s). >>>> >>>> As all SCI recommendations go, the SCI has achieved full consensus on >>>> these recommendations, and a public comment period on the proposed >>>> modifications was opened on July 2nd 2016, and closed on August 14th 2016 >>>> (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-op-procedures-2016-07-05-en). >>>> >>>> With the creation of the GNSO Review WG, these should be the final two >>>> projects the SCI will have worked on before it is standing-no-more, and I >>>> just wanted to say that working on this committee has been a pleasure. The >>>> SCI’s done some really solid work for the GNSO over the years, and its >>>> members have worked very well to give the GNSO Council recommendations >>>> that have been very diligently thought out. Both present and past members >>>> of the SCI have my gratitude. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> Amr >>>> >>>> <Motion for Proposed Modifications to GNSO Operating Procedures Relating >>>> to Elections and Motions 15-08-16.docx> >>> >>> Amr, >>> >>> Perhaps adding that gratitude to the motion would be in order ? I know it's >>> a bit cliché, but in this case we mean it, I believe. >>> >>> >>> >>> Rubens >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
|