Re: [gnso-improvem-impl-sc] Fwd: [council] Motion for SCI Proposed Modifications Relating to Elections and Motions

[Angie Graves <angie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Amr,

Will you please clarify the meaning of "officially disband the SCI"?

Thank you,

Angie


On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In my capacity as the Council liaison to the SCI, I sent this to the
> Council list a few days ago, and neglected to send a copy here. Thought you
> should all know. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > From: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [council] Motion for SCI Proposed Modifications Relating to
> Elections and Motions
> > Date: August 16, 2016 at 3:43:40 PM GMT+2
> > To: "GNSO Council List (council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > Hi again,
> >
> > I’ve attached a revised motion to this email. Apart from making the
> changes recommended by Rubens.
> >
> > I’ve also taken the opportunity to follow up on a motion from the
> Council’s July 16th meeting disbanding the SCI following the completion of
> the two tasks addressed in this motion. So if the Council does vote in
> favour of this motion, I thought it’d make sense to officially disband the
> SCI in the process.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Amr
> >
>
> >
> >> On Aug 15, 2016, at 9:27 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Rubens,
> >>
> >> I certainly consider this a friendly amendment to the motion, and not
> too cliché for my taste. :)
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Amr
> >>
> >>> On Aug 15, 2016, at 9:09 PM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Em 15 de ago de 2016, à(s) 16:11:000, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> escreveu:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> In my capacity as the Council liaison to the Standing Committee on
> Improvements, I am submitting this motion to adopt modifications to the
> GNSO Operating Procedures proposed by the SCI. These modifications involve
> both the process for GNSO Councillors to submit motions, in addition to the
> process to elect a GNSO Council Chair/Vice-Chair(s).
> >>>>
> >>>> As all SCI recommendations go, the SCI has achieved full consensus on
> these recommendations, and a public comment period on the proposed
> modifications was opened on July 2nd 2016, and closed on August 14th 2016 (
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-op-procedures-2016-07-05-en).
> >>>>
> >>>> With the creation of the GNSO Review WG, these should be the final
> two projects the SCI will have worked on before it is standing-no-more, and
> I just wanted to say that working on this committee has been a pleasure.
> The SCI’s done some really solid work for the GNSO over the years, and its
> members have worked very well to give the GNSO Council recommendations that
> have been very diligently thought out. Both present and past members of the
> SCI have my gratitude.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks.
> >>>>
> >>>> Amr
> >>>>
> >>>> <Motion for Proposed Modifications to GNSO Operating Procedures
> Relating to Elections and Motions 15-08-16.docx>
> >>>
> >>> Amr,
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps adding that gratitude to the motion would be in order ? I know
> it's a bit cliché, but in this case we mean it, I believe.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Rubens
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>