Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Draft Status Report to send to the GAC on Feb 29th
I think that vagueness is appropriate here. I take the "any" here to mean any and all RCRC/IOC activities as opposed to some specific activity. The onus is on the applicant to demonstrate that users will not infer a relationship to RCRC/IOC why there is no relationship that should be worried about. Alan At 28/02/2012 08:38 AM, Neuman, Jeff wrote: Thanks for the comments. The first comment makes a lot of sense and I have changed the wording. See new revised version.The second comment is more substantive, and I am going to ask the group if there is anything we can do at this stage to define that more clearly. Does anyone have any suggestions? If we can get to agreement on something in the next day, then I will substitute the new wording. Otherwise, we can leave this as a discussion point and resolve over the next week.Here is what that section states. Please comment on the highlighted portion.i. If the applied-for TLD is not identical to any of the Modified Reserved Names, but fails initial string similarity review with one of Modified Reserved Names, the applicant may attempt to override the string similarity failure by:1. Seeking a letter of non-objection from the IOC or the RCRC, as applicable; or2. If it cannot obtain a letter of non-objection, the applicant must:a. claim to have a legitimate interest in the string, and demonstrate the basis for this claim; and b. explain why it believes that the new TLD is not confusingly similar to one of the protected strings and makes evident that it does not refer to the IOC, RCRC or any Olympic or Red Cross Red Crescent activity.Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business AffairsThe information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.From: Novoa, Osvaldo [mailto:onovoa@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 8:30 AM To: Neuman, Jeff Cc: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Draft Status Report to send to the GAC on Feb 29th Dear Jeff, It is an excellent job. Thank you very much for your hard work.I have consulted my constituency regarding the proposal, Recommendation 1, and the only observations Ive received where:Recommendation 1, lit. b. Where it says too similar, we think it would be more in line with the applicant guidebook to say confusingly similar.Recommendation 1, lit. c., ii. 2, b. where it says « any Olympic or Red Cross Red Crescent activity », the activities should be define more clearly.Im sorry to submit these observations so near the call with the GAC. I´ll be on the conversation next Friday. Best Regards, Osvaldo [] Ing. Osvaldo Novoa Sub Gerente General R.I.I.C. ANTEL Tel: +598 2928 6444 E-mail: <mailto:onovoa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>onovoa@xxxxxxxxxxxx ----------De: <mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] En nombre de Neuman, JeffEnviado el: Lunes, 27 de Febrero de 2012 06:54 p.m. Para: <mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx Asunto: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Draft Status Report to send to the GAC on Feb 29th All,As previously discussed, in order to be able to secure the call with the GAC on Friday, I had to commit to drafting a status report on the current state of affairs with the drafting team and the recommendations. Please find enclosed what I drafted over the weekend and let me know if you have any questions, comments or concerns. It is a report from the chair and has no official status. I put in a bunch of disclaimers in the first footnote about that.Thanks for your help with this and I look forward to having a productive conversation on Friday with interested GNSO Council and GAC members.Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling, VA 20166Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / <mailto:jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx>jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx / www.neustar.bizThe information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.----------El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la InformaciónThis e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.
|