Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Current Results on Consensus Call

[Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Jeff,

You can add my No and I endorse the rationale given by konstantinos and joy.

Btw I thought that when we participate in wg or dt it is as individuals not
as representatives of our C/SG.

Best,

Rafik
On Mar 8, 2012 2:40 PM, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> All,****
>
> ** **
>
> In order to predict the level of support/consensus for the
> recommendations, as there are multiple people from the same
> constituencies/organizations, for fairness purposes, I am grouping those
> individuals together.  Thus, so far, I have noted the following:****
>
> ** **
>
> RySG – Yes (Gomes)****
>
> IPC – Yes (Evans, Shatan)****
>
> ISP – Yes (Novoa)****
>
> BC – Yes (DelBianco)****
>
> NCUC – No (liddicoat/Komaitis)****
>
> NCA Appointes – Yes (Ajayi, Rickert)****
>
> ALAC – Yes (Greenberg)****
>
> Red Cross – Yes (Hughes, Hankins, Lanord)****
>
> IOC – Yes (Bikoff, Malancharuvil, Heasley)****
>
> ** **
>
> Given these results, and the fact that we have heard from all of the major
> constituencies, and other groups that regularly participated, I believe we
> have consensus (but not full consensus) support for the recommendations.
> According to the guidelines, Consensus does not require unanimity. See
> http://gnso.icann.org/council/docs.html (annex 1).****
>
> ** **
>
> I will report this to the Council along with the statements from the NCUC
> members.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks to everyone for participating and see many of you in a couple of
> days.****
>
> ** **
>
> *Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs*
> 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling, VA 20166
> *Office:** *+1.571.434.5772  *Mobile: *+1.202.549.5079  *Fax: *
> +1.703.738.7965 */* jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx  */* www.neustar.biz ****
> ------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete the original message.****
>
> ** **
>