ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-iocrc-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Current Results on Consensus Call

  • To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Current Results on Consensus Call
  • From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 00:47:47 -0500

Yes Rafik, I can add you.  You are correct that you are participating as 
individuals, but in order to not skew the results, I grouped the people 
together that come from the same groups.  In other words, just like I did not 
want to count the IOC as submitting 3 yes votes, I did not want to count the 
people from the NCUC as voting no 3 times for fairness purposes.  This helps to 
avoid groups from being captured simply by having more members come from one 
group.

I hope that makes sense.

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs

________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.


From: Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:45 AM
To: Neuman, Jeff
Cc: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Current Results on Consensus Call


Hello Jeff,

You can add my No and I endorse the rationale given by konstantinos and joy.

Btw I thought that when we participate in wg or dt it is as individuals not as 
representatives of our C/SG.

Best,

Rafik
On Mar 8, 2012 2:40 PM, "Neuman, Jeff" 
<Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
All,

In order to predict the level of support/consensus for the recommendations, as 
there are multiple people from the same constituencies/organizations, for 
fairness purposes, I am grouping those individuals together.  Thus, so far, I 
have noted the following:

RySG – Yes (Gomes)
IPC – Yes (Evans, Shatan)
ISP – Yes (Novoa)
BC – Yes (DelBianco)
NCUC – No (liddicoat/Komaitis)
NCA Appointes – Yes (Ajayi, Rickert)
ALAC – Yes (Greenberg)
Red Cross – Yes (Hughes, Hankins, Lanord)
IOC – Yes (Bikoff, Malancharuvil, Heasley)

Given these results, and the fact that we have heard from all of the major 
constituencies, and other groups that regularly participated, I believe we have 
consensus (but not full consensus) support for the recommendations. According 
to the guidelines, Consensus does not require unanimity. See 
http://gnso.icann.org/council/docs.html (annex 1).

I will report this to the Council along with the statements from the NCUC 
members.

Thanks to everyone for participating and see many of you in a couple of days.

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772<tel:%2B1.571.434.5772>  Mobile: 
+1.202.549.5079<tel:%2B1.202.549.5079>  Fax: 
+1.703.738.7965<tel:%2B1.703.738.7965> / 
jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx>  / 
www.neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz/>
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy