Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Current Results on Consensus Call

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Jeff, Since I am not on this group formally 
representing ALAC, it should say "At-Large" 
instead of ALAC. But please note that my Yes was 
a personal position and should not be represented 
as a position of At-Large or ALAC. I will report 
back prior to the Wednesday GNSO meeting whether 
my position is formally supported by ALAC or not.
Alan

At 08/03/2012 12:38 AM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:
> All,
>
> In order to predict the level of 
> support/consensus for the recommendations, as 
> there are multiple people from the same 
> constituencies/organizations, for fairness 
> purposes, I am grouping those individuals 
> together.  Thus, so far, I have noted the following:
> RySG – Yes (Gomes)
> IPC – Yes (Evans, Shatan)
> ISP – Yes (Novoa)
> BC – Yes (DelBianco)
> NCUC – No (liddicoat/Komaitis)
> NCA Appointes – Yes (Ajayi, Rickert)
> ALAC – Yes (Greenberg)
> Red Cross – Yes (Hughes, Hankins, Lanord)
> IOC – Yes (Bikoff, Malancharuvil, Heasley)
>
> Given these results, and the fact that we have 
> heard from all of the major constituencies, and 
> other groups that regularly participated, I 
> believe we have consensus (but not full 
> consensus) support for the recommendations. 
> According to the guidelines, Consensus does not 
> require unanimity. See 
> <http://gnso.icann.org/council/docs.html>http://gnso.icann.org/council/docs.html 
> (annex 1).
> I will report this to the Council along with the 
> statements from the NCUC members.
> Thanks to everyone for participating and see many of you in a couple of days.
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
> 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling, VA 20166
> Office: +1.571.434.5772  Mobile: 
> +1.202.549.5079  Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / 
> <mailto:jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx>jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx  / www.neustar.biz
> The information contained in this e-mail message 
> is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) 
> named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> privileged information. If you are not the 
> intended recipient you have received this e-mail 
> message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this message is 
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
> communication in error, please notify us 
> immediately and delete the original message.