<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Language Issue Solution
- To: "Neuman, Jeff (Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx)" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, "gshatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gshatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Language Issue Solution
- From: Jim Bikoff <jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:22:20 +0000
All,
Proposal 2 would now read as follows:
The GAC has proposed that the IOC and RCRC "names should be protected in
multiple languages-all translations of the listed names in languages used on
the Internet...The lists of protected names that the IOC and RC/RC have
provided are illustrative and representative, not exhaustive."
The Drafting Team agrees that the list of languages currently provided in
Section 2.2.1.2.3 of the Applicant Guidebook are illustrative and
representative.
Other illustrative and representative languages can be added to the list later,
to cover the second level and later application rounds.
Jim Bikoff
James L. Bikoff
Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff, LLP
1101 30th Street, NW
Suite 120
Washington, DC 20007
Tel: 202-944-3303
Fax: 202-944-3306
jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx>
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx]<mailto:[mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx]>
On Behalf Of Shatan, Gregory S.
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:10 PM
To: Hughes, Debra Y.; Neuman, Jeff; Kiran Malancharuvil;
gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jim Bikoff; shankins@xxxxxxxx<mailto:shankins@xxxxxxxx>;
christophe.lanord@xxxxxxxx<mailto:christophe.lanord@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Languge Issue Solution
Is the appropriate change:
1. To remove the last sentence of Proposal 2
2. To remove all of Proposal 2 (referring to as many languages as feasible), or
3. To edit Proposal 2 to support the utilization only of the languages set
forth in the AGB?
Leaving the rest of Proposal 2 doesn't seem to make sense to me, since it is at
odds with the proposed change below. Thus, I would suggest the amendment
should be either 2 or 3 above.
Greg
Gregory S. Shatan
Deputy Chair| Tech Transactions Group
IP | Technology | Media
ReedSmithLLP
The business of relationships
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
212.549.0275 | Phone
917.816.6428 | Mobile
212.521.5450 | Fax
gshatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gshatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
www.reedsmith.com<http://www.reedsmith.com>
pdc1
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|