ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-iocrc-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-iocrc-dt] Revised Redline of Motion

  • To: "Neuman, Jeff (Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx)" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Shatan, Gregory S. (GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)" <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Revised Redline of Motion
  • From: Jim Bikoff <jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:25:00 +0000

All,

A few small revisions, answering earlier questions:


Recommendation 2:    Protect the IOC/RCRC Terms in Multiple Languages

            The GAC has proposed that the IOC and RCRC "names should be 
protected in multiple languages-all translations of the listed names in 
languages used on the Internet...The lists of protected names that the IOC and 
RC/RC have provided are illustrative and representative, not exhaustive."
The Drafting Team recommends that at the top level for this initial round, the 
list of names in languages currently provided in Section 2.2.1.2.3 of the 
Applicant Guidebook is sufficient.

Jim Bikoff

James L. Bikoff
Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff, LLP
1101 30th Street, NW
Suite 120
Washington, DC 20007
Tel: 202-944-3303
Fax: 202-944-3306
jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx>


From: "Shatan, Gregory S." <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: March 13, 2012 4:01:01 PM CST
To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>>, 
<gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Revised Redline of Motion
A few small proposed changes, and a point of clarification:

In the last new "Whereas" clause, I think the word "of" after "policy impact" 
should be "on".

With the change to Recommendation 2, I would suggest that the title of 
Recommendation 2 be changed to "In the Initial Round, Protect the IOC/RCRC 
Terms in the Languages Provided in Section 2.2.1.2.3 of the Applicant 
Guidebook"  (It now still reads "Protect the IOC/RCRC Terms in as many 
Languages as Feasible")

In recommendation 3 I would insert the word "names" after "RCRC" in the 
newly-added language.

The point of clarification:

Recommendation 2 now refers to "the list of languages ... in Section 2.2.1.2.3" 
of the AGB.  This Section does not in fact list "languages."  What it does list 
are specific names/strings in a number of languages.  However, it does not list 
all of the same strings in all of the languages.  For instance, REDLIONANDSUN 
is listed in English only (at least among languages using the Roman alphabet; 
perhaps it is there in Farsi as well).  MOGENDAVIDADOM is there in English, 
Hebrew and transliterated Hebrew only.  Some languages are used only for the 
IOC names and some only for the RCRC names.

My question is:  Are we recommending that the specific names/strings listed in 
the AGB be used at the top level in the first round?  Or are we recommending 
that all the languages used in Section 2.2.1.2.3 of the AGB be applied to all 
of the strings listed in Section 2.2.1.2.3 of the AGB (thus expanding the total 
number of names/strings beyond those specifically on the list, e.g., 
REDLIONANDSUN would now be "protected" in Chinese)?

Greg


Gregory S. Shatan
Deputy Chair| Tech Transactions Group
IP | Technology | Media
ReedSmithLLP
The business of relationships
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
212.549.0275 | Phone
917.816.6428 | Mobile
212.521.5450 | Fax
gshatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gshatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
www.reedsmith.com<http://www.reedsmith.com>


________________________________
From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx]<mailto:[mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx]>
 On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 5:22 PM
To: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Revised Redline of Motion
All,
Based on the e-mails of the Drafting Team, please find enclosed the revised 
version of the motion.  Once we are all ok, we will need someone at the council 
to make these friendly amendments (after someone seconds the motion).  Have you 
had discussions with your groups.
Best regards,
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772  Mobile: +1.202.549.5079  Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / 
jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx>  / 
www.neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz/>
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy